MHB What Determines the Time Dependent Value of A[t] in Quasi-Static Approximations?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mk747pe
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Constant Function
mk747pe
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I'm working on my bachelor's thesis, and I ran into a problem. In the text they say: "For hot
oil/watering jobs, U is typically large enough that f(t) is closer to a constant temperature than
constant flux boundary condition. In the quasi-static approximation,
these integrals are solved assuming that A[t] is a constant independent of time and then the
appropriate time dependent value of A[t] is plugged into the approximate solutions."

I don't understand how to do it. What will be that "appropriate time dependent value of A[t]"?View attachment 7574

I will be grateful for any advice,
Full text in the attachment,

Thanks in advance. Full text View attachment 7575
 

Attachments

Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
mk747pe said:
Hello,

I'm working on my bachelor's thesis, and I ran into a problem. In the text they say: "For hot
oil/watering jobs, U is typically large enough that f(t) is closer to a constant temperature than
constant flux boundary condition. In the quasi-static approximation,
these integrals are solved assuming that A[t] is a constant independent of time and then the
appropriate time dependent value of A[t] is plugged into the approximate solutions."

I don't understand how to do it. What will be that "appropriate time dependent value of A[t]"?

I will be grateful for any advice,
Full text in the attachment,

Thanks in advance. Full text

Hi mk747pe! Welcome to MHB! ;)

Your documents seem to be missing some context.
Anyway, my current interpretation is that we presumably have a fully known function A[t].
And we want to integrate something or solve some differential equation (that I can't seem to find) that includes A[t].
To do so, we assume A[t] to be constant to make it easier to integrate or solve the equation.
That is, we replace A[t] everywhere by A.
And when we have found the solution, we replace every occurrence of A again by A[t] for an approximate solution.

Btw, since this seems to be more about understanding what it all means than about actually integrating or solving a differential equation, I'm moving your thread to Other Advanced Topics.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top