What disciplines do I need for building a Quadcopter?

AI Thread Summary
To build a quadcopter, a solid understanding of basic physics, mechanics, calculus, and differential equations is essential, as highlighted in the discussion. The original poster expressed difficulty in comprehending a technical PDF, indicating a gap in foundational knowledge rather than just a lack of mathematical symbols. Resources such as Khan Academy are recommended for learning these concepts without extensive formal education. Additionally, community-driven websites like ArduPilot and AeroQuad provide valuable guides and open-source software for drone building. Mastering these disciplines will facilitate a better grasp of the technical material necessary for successful quadcopter construction.
JimBakker
Hi everybody, new to the forums :) I have a personal dream to build a drone/quadcopter from scratch. I'm aware it's not an easy task, and I've also searched this forum (and Google) for similar threads before posting:
My Question(s)

My goal is first simulating a quadcopter before building it, but when looking at the PDF suggested in the second link, I cannot understand most of the symbols found in the document. Quite frankly I'm lost and only guessing certain parts :(
  • I'd love to know the minimum knowledge in order to understand this document in particular.
  • Is there a site where I can easily find the definition of every Mathematical symbols, other then Wiki and this?
  • My Math and physics background is based on 3D game programming. I'm no professional, but I can write my own 3D scenes in modern OpenGL using C++. So I'm able to construct matrices and multiply them in order to create model, view, projection matrices.

    I can also give my simulation basic high-school physics: like springs, gravity, etc. But unfortunately, I've learned everything on the Internet in bits and pieces just to get a scene running.
If I learned math and physics from a programmer point of view, how can I learn to read math and physics in that PDF? I'll handle the electronics part, but reading this document is my problem.

Thank you very much for reading!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
:welcome:

I looked at the paper. It's pretty good except that the author is sloppy in defining his variables. Your problem is not that you lack a dictionary of mathematical symbols, but rather that you lack basic physics, mechanics, calculus and differential equations. I don't think the gaming approach will work. You need real physics.

But there is a way to do it without two years of engineering school. khanacademy.org provides perhaps the easiest possible way to learn those things you need. Check it out.
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman
anorlunda said:
:welcome:

I looked at the paper. It's pretty good except that the author is sloppy in defining his variables. Your problem is not that you lack a dictionary of mathematical symbols, but rather that you lack basic physics, mechanics, calculus and differential equations. I don't think the gaming approach will work. You need real physics.

But there is a way to do it without two years of engineering school. khanacademy.org provides perhaps the easiest possible way to learn those things you need. Check it out.

Wow, that was a quick reply, thanks Anorlunda. I guess you read that document the same way a programmer reads code. I really hope I can do that as well.

So you suggest I try learning: basic physics, mechanics, calculus and differential equations? I'll search and prepare my study curriculum immediately if that's the case.
 
berkeman said:
You can have a look through this Wikipedia page to start to get more of a feel for the math behind Control Theory and Feedback... :smile:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Control_theory

Berkeman, thank you very much for sharing as well. Sorry about the late response. Going back to basic physics, calculus and mechanics as Anorlunda suggested first, and hopefully I'll get it afterwards.
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman
I took a graduate level course in control systems for flight dynamics and this was the textbook that they used:

https://www.amazon.com/dp/0691149216/?tag=pfamazon01-20

It was really interesting because the techniques that were used here were developed out of research done for the US Air Force. There was a small startup formed in order to sell an autopilot built on the technology and it was somewhat recently acquired by Lockheed Martin. What I really liked about the course is that the book starts from first principles and develops the theory bit by bit. At first it develops the equations of motion, then talks about sensors (including GPS) and filtering, and eventually ends somewhere near path planning with waypoints. Although the book focuses mainly on fixed-wing aircraft, there is enough there that the leap to quadrotors won't be too bad.

The prerequisites for this are probably a good understanding of linear algebra, calculus, kinematics, and maybe some fluid dynamics.
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman
Back
Top