What distance is used in Hubble's Law.

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Javier Chornet
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hubble's law Law
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the interpretation of distance in Hubble's Law, specifically whether the distance used is the proper distance at the time of observation or the distance at the time the light was emitted from the galaxy. The scope includes theoretical considerations and implications for measuring Hubble's constant.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether the distance in Hubble's Law refers to the observed distance of an object or its actual distance at the time of observation.
  • Another participant asserts that the distance used is the "proper distance," which is measured at the time of observation.
  • A later reply emphasizes that the redshift measures the expansion of the universe between the time the light was emitted and the current time, suggesting that redshift cannot simply be interpreted as a Doppler shift.
  • There is a suggestion that calculating the value of Hubble's constant requires theoretical consideration of the data from when the light was emitted.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the interpretation of distance in Hubble's Law, with some supporting the notion of proper distance while others raise questions about the implications of redshift and its relation to the distance at the time of light emission. The discussion remains unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the complexities of measuring distances in cosmology, including the effects of light travel time and the expansion of the universe, but do not resolve these complexities.

Javier Chornet
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I was thinking about the Hubble's law and I know that it's determined as H(t)=\frac{1}{a(t)}\frac{da(t)}{dt} and then, thinking in the derivate of the scale factor as the speed, we've de usual formula v(t)=H(t)D
But my question is: the distance is the distance we observe the object (so now it's in farther because of the time that takes the light to go across these distance) or the real distance of the object?
In other worlds: is the distance of the galaxy when the light was emmited or the real distance at the moment of observation (despite we observe it nearest)?

I was thinking on it and trying to solve it using the derivation of the formula but I'm not convinced on any option.

Thanks,
Javier Chornet.
 
Space news on Phys.org
The distance that's used for this purpose is known as the "proper distance". This is the distance that would be measured by a ruler at the time of observation.

If you want an in-depth view of distance measures in cosmology, see here:
http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/9905116
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Javier Chornet
Chalnoth said:
The distance that's used for this purpose is known as the "proper distance". This is the distance that would be measured by a ruler at the time of observation.

If you want an in-depth view of distance measures in cosmology, see here:
http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/9905116
So the used disance is the real distance of the galaxy at the moment of the observation (further than the distance we observe because the finite spee light).
Thank you! Your answer was so iluminating, and the paper you've referred is great!
Thanks again!
 
Chalnoth said:
The distance that's used for this purpose is known as the "proper distance". This is the distance that would be measured by a ruler at the time of observation.

If you want an in-depth view of distance measures in cosmology, see here:
http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/9905116
Sorry again,
But then, if I measure the redshift, I'm measuring the speed that the galaxy had when she emmited the light. So for knowing the speed at the proper distance for know the value of Hubble's constant, you must calculate it theoretically based on the data collected from when the ligth was emmited, musn't you?
 
Javier Chornet said:
Sorry again,
But then, if I measure the redshift, I'm measuring the speed that the galaxy had when she emmited the light. So for knowing the speed at the proper distance for know the value of Hubble's constant, you must calculate it theoretically based on the data collected from when the ligth was emmited, musn't you?
Actually, the redshift measures the amount of expansion between the time the light was emitted and the current time.

There is some change in the redshift due to the movement of us and the far-away galaxy relative to the background expansion. But for the most part the redshift can't really be understood as a doppler shift at all. Rather, as the universe expands, the wavelength of the photon also increases along with the expansion.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K