What Distinguishes Rings, Fields, and Spaces in Mathematics?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Gregg
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fields Rings
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the distinctions between rings, fields, and spaces in mathematics, focusing on their definitions and the axioms that govern them. Participants explore the relationships and differences among these mathematical structures.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that rings, fields, and spaces are defined as sets with multiplication and addition axioms, questioning the differences among them.
  • Another participant clarifies that a field is a specific type of ring where every nonzero element has a multiplicative inverse, indicating that while all fields are rings, not all rings are fields.
  • A participant expresses uncertainty about the term "spaces," suggesting that there are many mathematical structures with similar axioms.
  • It is pointed out that vector spaces require both a set of vectors and a field of scalars, and that a field can be viewed as a vector space over itself, highlighting the intrinsic differences between these structures.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the foundational definitions but express differing views on the implications of these definitions and the relationships between the structures, indicating that the discussion remains somewhat unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Some assumptions about the definitions of rings, fields, and spaces may be implicit, and the discussion does not fully explore the implications of these definitions or the specific contexts in which they apply.

Gregg
Messages
452
Reaction score
0
They all seem to be defined as sets with multiplication and addition axioms satisfied. What is the difference?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A field is a ring where every nonzero element has a multiplicative inverse. All fields are rings, but not vice-versa. What spaces are you talking about, vector spaces?
 
Maybe spaces is not accurate but there seem to be a lot of things which are defined as having satisfying similar axioms.
 
Yes, it's true, but they do all have their differences. Vector spaces, for example, need both a set of vectors and a field of scalars. You can treat a field as a vector space over itself, because of the similarity of the axioms, but they are intrinsically different.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K