Line
- 216
- 0
Throughout EE I've seen many symbols. When it comes to voltage I've seen E,V,and e. Do they all mean the same thing?
The discussion revolves around the meanings and usages of the symbols E, V, and e in the context of voltage and electric fields, with references to potential difference and electromotive force. Participants explore various definitions and contexts in which these symbols are used, including textbooks and practical applications.
Participants do not reach a consensus on the meanings of E, V, and e, with multiple competing views and interpretations presented throughout the discussion.
There are unresolved issues regarding the definitions and contexts of the symbols, as well as the potential for confusion between different uses of E, V, and e in various texts and applications.
berkeman said:Sounds like your book has problems. What are the title and author of the book? Potential difference is voltage V, and [tex]E = - \nabla V[/tex]
Holy smokes, that's totally wrong and misleading. Try putting units into that equation...Line said:If you're counting V is the actual voltage and Eis the voltage with ground
calculated then [tex]E=V- \nabla V[/tex] ...potential difference.
Potential DIfference does eqaul voltage minus the change in voltage doesn't it?berkeman said:Holy smokes, that's totally wrong and misleading. Try putting units into that equation...
It can, but that's not what you wrote. There's a big difference between [tex]\nabla[/tex] and [tex]\Delta[/tex]Line said:Potential DIfference does eqaul voltage minus the change in voltage doesn't it?
You are correct, E can be used for http://www.phys.uAlberta.ca/~gingrich/phys395/notes/node8.html .Valhalla said:E can be used for electromotive force which is equivalent to voltage right?
So in your book, they are using E interchangably with V for voltage potential. (they are virtually synonymous).Line said:In the beginning of the book they teach us E as the voltage.
I=E/R
Then in the middle they give us V.
P=VV/R