What do you want to be? Question

  • Thread starter Thread starter munky99999
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around the challenges faced by individuals studying physics and mathematics when explaining their fields to non-specialists, particularly family members. Many participants share experiences of being misunderstood, often with relatives confusing physics with physical education or fitness. Suggestions for simplifying explanations include using catchy phrases like "rocket science" or "understanding the universe" to impress relatives and avoid lengthy discussions. Some participants express frustration over the perception that physics is more complex than biology, while others argue that all sciences are interconnected and equally valuable. The conversation highlights the difficulty of conveying the nuances of scientific disciplines to those outside the field and the importance of finding a balance between educating others and providing concise, impressive responses. Additionally, there is a lighthearted exchange about the stereotypes associated with various scientific fields and the personal motivations driving individuals in their academic pursuits.
  • #31
Gonzolo said:
It is because physicists are far superior intellectually than biologists in most respects, what with the formulas and the abstract concepts and the funky hair and the dangerous experiments and the schizo personnalities [Prof. Frink noise] ...

[fetal position under a "PF" banner, anticipating a gruesome physical reply]
You should be cowering somewhere. You should have read the post in General Discussion about tribdog's leg injury before saying something like that to Moonbear. People in the biology field (and the medical field for that matter) are scary. :eek:

Worse yet, go to some of the sites Moonbear links to.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Hopefully no one takes that seriously. I'm having a boring day, and needed somekind of action. All my respect to biologists. I just find it funny when people argue over who's smarter than who. :-p
 
  • #33
Majoring in math education sucks for this. First all the poly sci, sociology, english, etc. majors look at you weird for majoring in math. And then you have all the physics, engineering, pure/applied math, etc. majors thinking you are an idiot for going into education.
 
  • #34
Gonzolo said:
It is because physicists are far superior intellectually than biologists in most respects, what with the formulas and the abstract concepts and the funky hair and the dangerous experiments and the schizo personnalities [Prof. Frink noise] ...

[fetal position under a "PF" banner, anticipating a gruesome physical reply]

You are dissing a man I have utmost respect for...

Isaac Asimov

He was a biochemists and he was :eek: intelligent! He was the vice-president of Mensa!
 
  • #35
BobG said:
You should be cowering somewhere. You should have read the post in General Discussion about tribdog's leg injury before saying something like that to Moonbear. People in the biology field (and the medical field for that matter) are scary. :eek:

Worse yet, go to some of the sites Moonbear links to.

He's lucky I didn't see that earlier in the day. I was having a very bad day today and might have had to use him as a "volunteer" to re-train some folks who screwed up the neurosurgeries for an experiment of mine. :devil:

Though, I think I have a new answer now for people who ask me where the brains in the freezer come from. I used to answer "annoying students," but now I think I'll revise that to, "physics students who make fun of biology." :biggrin: :smile:
 
  • #36
As a joke goes:

/*Physics Class

As a premed student at Washington University in St. Louis, I had to take a
difficult class in physics. One day our professor was discussing a
particularly complicated concept. A student rudely interrupted to ask
"Why do we have to learn this irrelevant stuff?"

"To save lives." the professor responded quickly and continued the
lecture.

A few minutes later, the same student spoke up again. "So how does
physics
save lives?" he persisted.

"It helps keeps the idiots like you out of medical school," replied the
professor.
*/

Every science field (Biology, Chemistry, Physics, etc) are interrelated and intervowen with mathematical principles and fundumental laws of nature and economics. By various mixes of sciences with practice you get engineering fields, medical doctors, various researchers and scifi writers. It isn't important what 'sociology, english, etc' majors think about you if you are majoring in mathematics. There is only one fundumental language and society of laws out there, written in math, and presented in various sciences. Study all the things you want and at the end if you study hard enough you'll enjoy the education you get as it expands your mind and makes you more perceptive of your surroundings
 
  • #37
well that's not true really.

Fluid dynamics which is physics directly relates to how blood flows through the veins.

Lots of things in physics made medicine possible.

Although most of the time, physics is to keep out lesser people.

Again I don't want a doctor who got the bare minimum 55% When we can make it so its 95% minimum.

Still I just don't understand how I like physics so much. I have worked out my motivation, but I am not exactly going the best route to do it.

You see my motivation is interesting. I'm a trekker as you could say. I'm very interested in making and studying devices which star trek inspires. Sonic Shower, Transporter, forcefields, tractorbeam, orbital tethers.

In the last year or so I read in the paper of people of someone attempting to build an orbital tether. I also live near the great lakes and I also read that Canada is making a "Huston" on the great lakes. With that X-plane thing succeeding in like september also, makes it very interesting right now.

I'm only at the beginning of my education though. I expect I will be studying whatever the proffessors or whoever chooses what you will research.

Once I have a lot of experience or PHD or whatever it takes to choose myself. I would study Sonic showers. I think that would be a huge hit. Especially for the space station and such. No waste of water only energy is required.
 
  • #38
which is better machatronics or nano technology? in your opinion

somebody?
 
Last edited:
  • #39
well as for job security, i'd go nanotechnology. FRom what I hear is mechatronics is way to full and chances are they will be cutting alot.

Nanotechnology has a lot of promise and not a while lot done as of yet. So if you were to start school now for one of them, i'd goto to University of Toronto and study nanotech. I believe that's where they wanted me to go. It was some other place in like hamilton or niagra falls for mechatronics. But simply i don't have the money to be going anywhere.
 

Similar threads

Replies
32
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
1K
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 92 ·
4
Replies
92
Views
7K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K