What Does 158 A*GeV/c in Pb + Pb Collisions Indicate?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Waxbear
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mean
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the interpretation of 158 A*GeV/c in Pb + Pb collisions at the SPS accelerator at CERN. Participants clarify that this value represents 158 GeV/c per nucleon, derived from the total beam momentum divided by the nuclear mass number A. The SPS has been upgraded to accelerate protons to 450 GeV, although the experiment referenced was conducted in 2000 when the SPS operated at 400 GeV. The LHC also utilizes similar energy ratios for proton and lead collisions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of nuclear physics concepts, particularly heavy ion collisions.
  • Familiarity with particle accelerator terminology, specifically SPS and LHC.
  • Knowledge of momentum calculations in nuclear physics.
  • Basic grasp of the relationship between charge (Z) and mass number (A) in nuclei.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the operational principles of the SPS and its upgrades for the LHC.
  • Study the significance of A*GeV/c in particle physics experiments.
  • Explore the implications of heavy ion collisions on nuclear physics research.
  • Learn about the energy levels and collision dynamics in the LHC.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in nuclear physics, particle physicists, and researchers interested in heavy ion collision experiments and accelerator physics.

Waxbear
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
I have an exam in introductory nuclear physics coming up in 2 days. I am supposed to present an article which i have already drawn. The article is about heavy ion collisions in the SPS accelerator at CERN. They keep mentioning that the experiment uses Pb + Pb collisions at 158 A*Gev/c beam momentum. Does this mean that i have to divide by the nuclear mass number A, to get the momentum of individual nucleons?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It means 158 GeV/c per nucleon.
 
Bill_K said:
It means 158 GeV/c per nucleon.

Okay. But according to Cern, the SPS is capable of beam energies of 400 Gev. I guess this is also pr nucleon then?
 
In a given magnetic field, the radius of curvature of the orbit of a singly charged particle is the same whether it's by itself or in a nucleus. So from what you say, the SPS can accelerate a single proton to 400 GeV, or a nucleus containing Z protons to 400 GeV per Z. For Pb-209, the ratio Z/A = 82/209 = 0.39, so 400 GeV per Z works out to 158 GeV per A.
 
Bill_K said:
In a given magnetic field, the radius of curvature of the orbit of a singly charged particle is the same whether it's by itself or in a nucleus. So from what you say, the SPS can accelerate a single proton to 400 GeV, or a nucleus containing Z protons to 400 GeV per Z. For Pb-209, the ratio Z/A = 82/209 = 0.39, so 400 GeV per Z works out to 158 GeV per A.

Ah, well that certainly explains it. Beautiful how the max energy of the sps works out to be exactly the energy mentioned in the article. Thank you for your help Bill!
 
I think your number of 400 GeV is outdated. As preaccelerator for the LHC, the SPS provides proton beams with 450 GeV.

The LHC has a similar ratio for proton proton and lead lead mode: 3.5 TeV protons and 1.38A TeV lead (corresponds to 3.517 TeV per charge) in 2011.
 
mfb said:
I think your number of 400 GeV is outdated. As preaccelerator for the LHC, the SPS provides proton beams with 450 GeV.

The LHC has a similar ratio for proton proton and lead lead mode: 3.5 TeV protons and 1.38A TeV lead (corresponds to 3.517 TeV per charge) in 2011.

I think you're right. But i think the SPS was upgraded from 400 Gev to 450 Gev when it was to be used as a pre-accelerator for the LHC. The experiment from my article was done way back in 2000, when the SPS was probably still operating at 400 Gev.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
14K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K