What Does a Negative or Imaginary Partition Function Indicate?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the implications of a negative or imaginary partition function in Euclidean quantum field theory, particularly in relation to a varying charge parameter. It highlights that for small charges, the partition function remains positive, but crosses a critical threshold where it becomes negative, raising questions about potential phase transitions. The presence of negative eigenvalues in the second order variation indicates instability at this critical point, suggesting that the saddle point approximation may no longer be valid for larger charges. The conversation also touches on the role of imaginary currents in the action and the nature of the functional integral, which is generally expected to be positive. Ultimately, the discussion seeks to understand the physical significance of these mathematical behaviors in the context of quantum field theory.
santale
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I have a partition function in euclidean quantum field theory. I have a parameter, let's say a charge, that I can change in the action that define the partition function.

I found that for small charge the partition function is positive, but there is a critical charge, above the one the partition function becomes negative.

Which is the meaning? Could this be interpreted as a phase transition?

General question: the partition function must be positive? which is the meaning of having an imaginary or negative partition function?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How can you get a minus sign, the partition function always has the action part exponentiated. Or are you asking something else?
 
1) My action has an imaginary current as interaction (due to Wick rotation in from the theory in Minkowski space).
2) From the symmetry if the action I know that the functional integral is positive so the partition function is well defined (it's like the integral of Exp(-x^2+ i x)
3) I want to extimate the partition function through the saddle point method. I find a critical point (that in my case is imaginary) and I expand the theory around it, calculating the second order variation.
4) For small charge, the second order variations are positive, but when I pass a critical charge I find two negative eigenvalues of the second order variation, that gives a factor minus 1 (the negativity of the partition function I refered).

The question is: what does imply the fact that in this case the fact I have a negative contribution? Phase transition? The critical point around the one I was expanding the theory is no more good for large charge?

Thanks
 
You can evaluate the integral in closed form here, it will not be negative. Saddle point method is approximate, also which charge are you talking about? Are you using a scalar field theory with Wick rotation and coupling as charge, then it does not have a critical point.
 
The action is Euclidean Yang Mills couled with an heavy static source (this is the imaginary current):
$$F_{\mu\nu}F^{\mu\nu}+i\delta_{\mu0}A_{\mu}$$

Solving the euclidean yang mills equation, I have an imaginary solution.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K