Undergrad What does adjacent indices mean in the context of matrix multiplication?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The term "adjacent indices" in the context of matrix multiplication refers to the summation indices that are eliminated in the resulting expression. In the discussion, it is clarified that the term is unnecessary, as the elimination of the summation index is a general property of summation, not exclusive to matrices. The example provided, $$\sum_{k=0}^nx^k=\frac{1-x^{n+1}}{1-x}$$, illustrates that the index \( k \) does not appear in the result. The mention of "adjacent" may relate to the summation convention but does not add value to the explanation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of matrix multiplication concepts
  • Familiarity with summation notation and conventions
  • Basic knowledge of mathematical indices
  • Experience with mathematical proofs and derivations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of summation indices in mathematical expressions
  • Explore the implications of summation conventions in linear algebra
  • Review S.M. Blinder's "Guide to Essential Math" for further insights on matrix operations
  • Practice deriving results from summations in various mathematical contexts
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of linear algebra, educators teaching matrix operations, and anyone interested in the nuances of mathematical notation and summation conventions.

Oppie
Messages
7
Reaction score
1
Hello, I was refreshing my Mathematics using S.M. Blinder's book "Guide to Essential Math" and on the section on Matrix Multiplication I got the following,

upload_2016-10-16_15-5-22.png


Can someone elaborate on the highlighted section? In particular, what does "adjacent indices" mean?

Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
'Elimination' just means that the result of the summation does not contain the index over which summation occurs. We see that from the fact that the RHS of the equation, which is just ##y_i##, has no ##k## in it.

The word 'adjacent' is unnecessary in the sentence. Nor is the observation relevant only to matrices. For any summation, the summation index is annihilated in the result. Consider for instance:
$$\sum_{k=0}^nx^k=\frac{1-x^{n+1}}{1-x}$$
There is no ##k## on the right-hand side.
 
  • Like
Likes Oppie
andrewkirk said:
'Elimination' just means that the result of the summation does not contain the index over which summation occurs. We see that from the fact that the RHS of the equation, which is just ##y_i##, has no ##k## in it.

The word 'adjacent' is unnecessary in the sentence. Nor is the observation relevant only to matrices. For any summation, the summation index is annihilated in the result. Consider for instance:
$$\sum_{k=0}^nx^k=\frac{1-x^{n+1}}{1-x}$$
There is no ##k## on the right-hand side.

Thank you. Maybe he mentions the word "adjacent" in consideration to the summation convention.
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K