MHB What does an asterisk (*) mean in the definition of an integral?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The asterisk (*) in the definition of an integral signifies "any $x_i$ within the subdivision interval" in the context of Riemann sums. This notation indicates that regardless of the specific point chosen within the interval, the Riemann sum will converge to the integral as the width of the rectangles, represented by $\Delta x = \frac{b - a}{n}$, approaches zero. The discussion also clarifies that using $n - 1$ instead of $n$ in summation notation is a matter of convention and does not affect the outcome, provided that the bottom index does not become zero.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Riemann sums
  • Familiarity with integral calculus
  • Knowledge of limits and convergence
  • Basic understanding of summation notation
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of Riemann sums in detail
  • Explore the implications of different summation conventions in calculus
  • Learn about the convergence of sequences and series
  • Investigate the relationship between integrals and limits
USEFUL FOR

Students of calculus, mathematics educators, and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of integral definitions and Riemann sums.

find_the_fun
Messages
147
Reaction score
0
In the definition of an integral what does the astrix (*) mean above the [math]x_i[/math]? I got confused in class today because the prof used an astrix but just to mean the equation we had been talking about.

View attachment 1250

Also, I sometimes see the top of the sigma being [math]n-1[/math] instead of [math]n[/math]. I guess it doesn't really make a difference since [math]n[/math] goes to infinity but why the difference?
 

Attachments

  • eq0004M.gif
    eq0004M.gif
    476 bytes · Views: 146
Physics news on Phys.org
Re: What does an astrix (*) mean in the definition of an integral?

In this context (Riemann sums, I presume) it means "any $x_i$ within the subdivision interval" (this interval being a function of $\Delta x = \frac{b - a}{n}$, which tends to zero, and represents the width of the little rectangles you are using to approximate the integral). This is because you'll see that no matter what $x_i$ you pick within this interval (left point, right point, midpoint, some random point, ...) the Riemann sum will converge to the integral.

See here for a better explanation.

As for the $n$ versus $n - 1$ problem, have you checked that the bottom doesn't become $0$ when $n - 1$ is used? Those are all conventions and are equivalent (or at least, they should be).
 
Relativistic Momentum, Mass, and Energy Momentum and mass (...), the classic equations for conserving momentum and energy are not adequate for the analysis of high-speed collisions. (...) The momentum of a particle moving with velocity ##v## is given by $$p=\cfrac{mv}{\sqrt{1-(v^2/c^2)}}\qquad{R-10}$$ ENERGY In relativistic mechanics, as in classic mechanics, the net force on a particle is equal to the time rate of change of the momentum of the particle. Considering one-dimensional...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K