What does eigenvalues and eigenvectors mean?

Click For Summary
Eigenvalues and eigenvectors represent fundamental concepts in linear transformations, where eigenvectors maintain their direction while being scaled by eigenvalues. They are crucial in modeling physical systems, such as determining the normal modes of vibration in structures like bridges, where each mode corresponds to a specific frequency (eigenvalue). In quantum mechanics, eigenvalues indicate possible measurements of observables, while eigenvectors represent physical states. Understanding these concepts can be enhanced by modeling real-world systems in matrix form, which often requires numerical methods for complex scenarios. Overall, eigenvalues and eigenvectors simplify the analysis of dynamic systems by allowing the study of independent modes of behavior.
chubbypaddy
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I have no trouble calculating eigenvalues but I have a hard time understanding how to use them. I know that you can somehow calculate a bridge's self-frequency with eigenvalues but I don't know how.

What I am after is, what do eigenvectors and eigenvectors mean physically or in other ways?
I know if you have linear transformation then the eigenvectors are those vectors that are just scaled and not changed in direction.

I think PageRank does something with eigenvectors but I don't know how, what's the idea?

Some good(simple though) text problems to actually model something real would be helpful.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I suppose maybe what you are missing is the idea of thinking of a function as a vector. You can multiply functions by scalars, which stretches them (or shrinks), and you can add functions together. These are just the algebraic properties that vectors have. The only real difference is that with functions, there are lots of different linearly independent functions, so they are really vectors in an infinite dimensional space, usually. Unless, you have a function that is defined on a finite set of points. Then, you get a finite-dimensional vector space of real-valued functions.

Typically, in physics, you'll have a physical system and you can express it in terms of "normal modes", which are eigenvectors. Each normal mode oscillates at some frequency. The frequency is basically an eigenvalue corresponding to that eigenvector (normal mode). As an example, if you have a vibrating string with fixed end points, then the normal modes will be sine waves, like sin {n π) or something like that (under suitable assumptions), times some other factor that varies with time. Each sine wave is basically a vector. The significance of these normal modes is that they don't interact. So, rather than having a complicated system of interacting parts, you can just reduce it down to studying the motion of each normal mode. In other words, it's basically just diagonalizing a matrix. So, you can solve the system of differential equations by just solving one first order equation for each normal mode. What I have described is essentially the theory of coupled harmonic oscillators. You can approximate any system near an equilibrium by couple harmonic oscillators, although, general physical systems can get more complicated. These kinds of ideas show up in quantum mechanics and quantum field theory, as well as in the classical theory of waves and oscillations.

In quantum mechanics, the eigenvalues are possible values of an observable and the eigenvectors are, again, physical states, which could be described by a compex-valued wave function, for example.
 
I guess the main part of your problem is not knowing how to model "real world" systems to get some equations in matrix form. Here's a simple example of a vibrating spring-and-mass system: http://lpsa.swarthmore.edu/MtrxVibe/EigApp/EigVib.html

Modelling the vibration of something like a bridge uses the same principle, but a real-world model may have thousands (or even hundreds of thousands) or variables, and creating the matrices is done numerically (with a computer) not algebraically.
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
10K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
9K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K