What Does Ground Mean in Electrical Terms?

Click For Summary
Ground in electrical terms refers to a common reference point for voltage, which can vary based on the context, such as Earth ground or system ground. It serves to stabilize electrical potential across different locations, minimizing voltage differences that can arise during power transmission. Grounding systems also enhance safety by allowing for the detection of faults, such as short circuits, through protective devices. In electronics, ground can refer to a floating ground, where the reference point is not connected to Earth, complicating potential measurements. Ultimately, ground is essential for ensuring consistent voltage references and safe operation in electrical systems.
  • #31
jim hardy said:
The current may be large or it may be small depending on conductivity of the soil, your skin and your shoe soles.
Back to the transformer is exactly where the current goes. Why do you dispute Kirchoff's Current Law ?
You have some un-learning to do, sir. Meantime you shouldn't confuse beginners with such misstatements.
Have you read IEEE 142 ?
The resistance of all of that is probably in the mega-ohms, yet people still get electrocuted.
The resistivity of soil is normally around ##\rho=100\Omega\text{m}##. Let's say the contact area between your feet and the ground is around ##A=10\text{cm}\times10\text{cm}## and that the pole transformer ground is ##l=100\text{m}## away (this is about how far mine is). The ground resistance is roughly
$$R=\frac{\rho l}{A}=1M\Omega$$
$$I=\frac{120\text{V}}{1M\Omega}=120\mu\text{A}$$
The point I'm trying to make is that if you stand outside on the ground, both your body and the ground have capacitance. The self capacitance of the Earth (##710\mu\text{F}##) is large enough to draw a fair amount of current.
$$R=\frac{1}{2\pi(60\text{Hz})(710\mu\text{F})}=3.7\Omega$$
$$I=\frac{120\text{V}}{3.7\Omega}=32\text{A}$$
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #32
NFuller, from experience I can tell you this isn't exactly the case (as in I have been bitten hooking services back up and by accidentally touching the line on meter cans when pulling the meter). By those equations I should be dead. You aren't exactly taking into account the resistance of the human body either, and that should be factored into your equation.

Also, just as an observation, being as we are talking about service entrances here, the vast majority of the current is going to take the path of least resistance, which is going to be through the ground rod, through the EGC back to the ground-neutral bond at the panel, and through the neutral conductor back to the transformer, making the assumption that you are standing closer to the service disconnect or meter can, which is an almost certainty if you are getting shocked, excluding exceptions such as energized, conductive building facade materials (like siding, or a tin building).

Good conversation so far, I'm having a lot of fun following it.
 
  • Like
Likes Asymptotic
  • #33
sparkie said:
NFuller, from experience I can tell you this isn't exactly the case (as in I have been bitten hooking services back up and by accidentally touching the line on meter cans when pulling the meter). By those equations I should be dead. You aren't exactly taking into account the resistance of the human body either, and that should be factored into your equation.
I'm ignoring the resistance of your shoes and body to directly compare ground resistance in the two cases.
sparkie said:
Also, just as an observation, being as we are talking about service entrances here, the vast majority of the current is going to take the path of least resistance, which is going to be through the ground rod, through the EGC back to the ground-neutral bond at the panel, and through the neutral conductor back to the transformer, making the assumption that you are standing closer to the service disconnect or meter can, which is an almost certainty if you are getting shocked, excluding exceptions such as energized, conductive building facade materials (like siding, or a tin building).
Notice that even if you change the length ##l## from ##100\text{m}## to ##1\text{m}## the current would only increase to ##12\text{mA}##. This is still to small to kill someone.
 
  • #34
NFuller said:
The resistance of all of that is probably in the mega-ohms, yet people still get electrocuted.
The resistivity of soil is normally around ρ=100Ωmρ=100Ωm\rho=100\Omega\text{m}. Let's say the contact area between your feet and the ground is around A=10cm×10cmA=10cm×10cmA=10\text{cm}\times10\text{cm} and that the pole transformer ground is l=100ml=100ml=100\text{m} away (this is about how far mine is). The ground resistance is roughly
R=ρlA=1MΩR=ρlA=1MΩ​
R=\frac{\rho l}{A}=1M\Omega
I=120V1MΩ=120μAI=120V1MΩ=120μA​
I=\frac{120\text{V}}{1M\Omega}=120\mu\text{A}
The point I'm trying to make is that if you stand outside on the ground, both your body and the ground have capacitance. The self capacitance of the Earth (710μF710μF710\mu\text{F}) is large enough to draw a fair amount of current.
R=12π(60Hz)(710μF)=3.7ΩR=12π(60Hz)(710μF)=3.7Ω​
R=\frac{1}{2\pi(60\text{Hz})(710\mu\text{F})}=3.7\Omega
I=120V3.7Ω=32AI=120V3.7Ω=32A​
I=\frac{120\text{V}}{3.7\Omega}=32\text{A}
I can assure you that the resistivity of soil is never typical.

Your ground resistance calculations are out by 5 or 6 orders of magnitude. You ignore the fact that the parallel conductive path is very wide and is shortened by metal pipes in the ground. In my experience the Earth is highly conductive because you are usually close to the water table with all that dissolved salt. I have done geophysical resistivity surveys and notice that the resistance drops rapidly once current begins to flow at depth.

Also, the fault current only needs to get to the Earth stake at the meter box, then it can cross the link to the neutral and travel along the neutral wire to the transformer. It certainly does not need to go all the way to the transformer through a shallow narrow strip of dry topsoil.

Nor do you have to charge the spherical Earth capacitor. To do that you would need to be standing on the moon with an electron beam gun. Or be the Sun, delivering a solar wind to the ionosphere. You are inside the Earth capacitance, until you are struck by lightning it is irrelevant to the discussion.

Your poor understanding and bad models of the electrical distribution system and the real world environment will get you into trouble, maybe even kill you. Until you realize your lack of experience and understanding you will be dangerous to yourself and others.
 
  • Like
Likes jim hardy, sparkie, Asymptotic and 1 other person
  • #35
well just lost an hour of typing a response. Something logged me out, draft disappeared when i clicked 'login' . @berkeman - anything fishy looking ? do my PF tracks show signs of a virus? old jim.
 
  • #36
hmm got logged out again on that one. But the draft didn't disappear.

NFuller: a measly one amp will charge Earth's 710 uf at the rate of 1408 volts per second , assuming you can distribute the charge equally over its whole surface. That's 11.7 volts every half a line cycle.
Since you can't distribute charge that fast it'll raise local Earth voltage more at the point of current injection reducing potential difference across your body.

That's why it's current flow around a closed loop that electrocutes people .

Another thread you might like
https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/trying-to-understand-electric-shocks.883550/
 
  • #37
jim hardy said:
well just lost an hour of typing a response. Something logged me out, draft disappeared when i clicked 'login' . @berkeman - anything fishy looking ? do my PF tracks show signs of a virus? old jim.
I don't see anything obvious. Nice featured thread about PV, btw. :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes jim hardy
  • #38
jim hardy said:
The current may be large or it may be small depending on conductivity of the soil, your skin and your shoe soles.

NFuller said:
The resistance of all of that is probably in the mega-ohms, yet people still get electrocuted.

I remember being surprised how much I didn't know about grounding when it came time to learn how to use a "ground Megger" and interpret the results. R=pl/A is but a starting point, but as @jim hardy and @Baluncore point out, coming close to an understanding what's actually going on is a wilder and woolier ride. Biddle has a good write-up of the basics, and is worth reading by anyone interested in what constitutes Earth ground.

www.weschler.com/_upload/sitepdfs/techref/gettingdowntoearth.pdf

Resistance varies in the manner of concentric shells around a grounding point, and is the reason behind step potential, and using a "bunny hop" or "shuffle step" technique to escape the vicinity of a downed power line (images were copped from a BC Hydro slide show and the document above).

ground_sphere of influence.jpg


ground_BC-Hydro_step potential.jpg
 

Attachments

  • ground_sphere of influence.jpg
    ground_sphere of influence.jpg
    27.9 KB · Views: 390
  • ground_BC-Hydro_step potential.jpg
    ground_BC-Hydro_step potential.jpg
    31.6 KB · Views: 647
  • Like
Likes jim hardy
  • #39
Wow. I first looked at this thread 36 hours ago. It was simple. But now I see it has become a mess. Ground is indeed a term with many definitions and many nuances.

The OP said his questions have been answered. Most of the following posts seem to go in directions other than the OP's question, so I think it's time to close this thread. If you want to discuss specific grounding practices, feel free to start a new thread.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
14K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
47K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
8K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
9K