Undergrad What does it mean to span the Bloch sphere?

Click For Summary
Spanning the Bloch sphere with a set of qubit gates means that the states generated by these gates can represent any point on the Bloch sphere. The example set of gates {I, X π/2, Y π/2, X π} is debated, as some argue that it does not cover all possible states due to the limitations of combining 90-degree rotations. Critics point out that many states on the Bloch sphere remain unreachable with this finite set of operations. A referenced article suggests that the term "span" may refer to the ability to characterize any state through measurements rather than achieving all states directly. The discussion highlights the nuances in understanding what it means for a set of gates to span the Bloch sphere.
PieroC
If I construct a set of qubit gates, say {G1, G2 ... Gk ... Gn}, that can act on a state |ψ>, what does it mean for the set of states Gk |ψ> to span the Bloch sphere?

As an example, take the set {G1, G2, G3, G4} = { I, X π/2 , Y π/2, Xπ }

Here, X π/2 denotes a π/2 rotation about the x-axis, Y π/2 denotes a π/2 rotation about the y-axis, and so on.
The set of states |ψk>= Gk |ψ>, is said to span the Bloch sphere. But I'm having trouble understanding what this really means.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
PieroC said:
what does it mean for the set of states Gk |ψ> to span the Bloch sphere?

It means that every state in the Bloch sphere is in the set of states ##G_k \vert \psi \rangle##.
 
  • Like
Likes PieroC
Where did you read that those specific operations span the Bloch sphere? To me it looks like they don't, because the set of rotations you can do by combining 90 degree turns is finite and pretty small. There will be plenty of states on the Bloch sphere that you can't get arbitrarily close to.
 
Strilanc said:
Where did you read that those specific operations span the Bloch sphere?

This article on quantum gate set tomography https://arxiv.org/pdf/1509.02921.pdf mentions example gate sets on pg 20. The gate set I described above is the first example used. To quote the article, "it is easy to see that the set of states Fk |ρ>> spans the Bloch sphere for any pure state |ρ>>."

Strilanc said:
To me it looks like they don't
I am also not convinced.
 
Oh, in that paper it looks like they're using "span" to mean "we can characterize any state on the Bloch sphere by measuring the computational-basis expectation after applying each of these operators" or something similar to that.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K