What does negative contrast look like?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the phenomenon of negative contrast observed when analyzing one atom thick material layers on silicon chips using Fresnel equations. The user successfully plotted contrast against oxide thickness and wavelength but encountered negative contrast values, particularly when examining graphene with multiple layers. The inquiry seeks to understand the visibility of these negative contrast results under a microscope and how to interpret them accurately.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Fresnel equations for optical analysis
  • Knowledge of material properties of graphene and silicon
  • Familiarity with microscopy techniques for material observation
  • Basic concepts of optical contrast in thin films
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of negative contrast in optical measurements
  • Explore advanced microscopy techniques for visualizing one atom thick materials
  • Study the effects of oxide thickness on optical properties of thin films
  • Investigate the relationship between layer thickness and contrast in graphene
USEFUL FOR

Researchers, materials scientists, and optical engineers interested in thin film analysis, particularly those working with graphene and silicon substrates.

DemoniWaari
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
I was trying to determine the best oxide thickness and material for maximising the contrast of one atom thick material layer on top of silicon chip. Using Fresnel equations I was able to do plot the contrast with respect to oxide thickness and wavelength, but alas, contrast seems to be sometimes negative.

So first I thought that there is something wrong with my code, but it works perfectly for graphene so that does not seem to be the case. I also checked that you can get negative contrast for graphene when there are enough layers, so maybe my result isn't completely wrong.

Thus what does this negative contrast look like? I want to know how easily one can see this one atom thick layer with a microscope, so I need some information on how I can interpret this result.

So, any help?
 
Science news on Phys.org
Thanks for the post! Sorry you aren't generating responses at the moment. Do you have any further information, come to any new conclusions or is it possible to reword the post?
 
I'm not going to pretend to understand the question fully, but nevertheless because negative contrast doesn't seem to make sense to me I was wondering if, like negative probabilities, it needs to be squared to get a positive value, or if indeed a negative value is the same as a positive value in this case... I'll get my coat...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
617
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K