What does normalized (k + 1)th divided difference at distinct nodes mean?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter CantorSet
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Difference Mean Nodes
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
1 reply · 3K views
CantorSet
Messages
44
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone,

This is not a homework question but a clarification on the following proof:

Suppose [itex]h[/itex] is an infinitely differentiable real-valued function defined on [itex]/Re[/itex] such that [itex]h(1/n)=0[/itex] for all [itex]n \in N[/itex]. Then prove [itex]h^{(k)}(0)=0[/itex] for all [itex]k \in[/itex].

Proof: Since h is infinitely differentiable in a neighborhood of 0, the kth derivative of h at 0 is the limit of its normalized (k+1)th divided difference at distinct nodes [itex]x_1,x_2,...,x_{k+1}[/itex] as they tend to 0: [tex]h^{(k)}(0)=k! \lim_{x_1,x_2,...,x_{k+1} \rightarrow 0 } \nabla (x_1,...,x_{k+1})h[/tex]

Now, choosing [itex]x_j := x_j(n) = \frac{1}{(n+j)}[/itex] and letting [itex]n \in \aleph[/itex] tend to infinity, we see that [itex]h^{k}(0) = 0[/itex] for all [itex]k \in N[/itex].

I don't understand the proof above since I don't know what normalized (k+1)th divided difference at distinct nodes means. Does anyone know?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
To rephrase the proof, we are using induction on k and Rolle's theorem.