What Does \Re2 \rightarrow \Re2 Mean in Linear Transformations?

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
5 replies · 4K views
DmytriE
Messages
78
Reaction score
0
Hi Pf,

Here is a question regard a test review that we have. I am not looking for the answer but rather a clarification about the notation.

1. What does the following mean? T1: [itex]\Re[/itex]2 [itex]\rightarrow[/itex] [itex]\Re[/itex]2 by x [itex]\rightarrow[/itex] Ax?

2. What does it mean to go [itex]\Re[/itex]2 [itex]\rightarrow[/itex] [itex]\Re[/itex]2

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
DmytriE said:
Hi Pf,

Here is a question regard a test review that we have. I am not looking for the answer but rather a clarification about the notation.

1. What does the following mean? T1: [itex]\Re[/itex]2 [itex]\rightarrow[/itex] [itex]\Re[/itex]2 by x [itex]\rightarrow[/itex] Ax?

2. What does it mean to go [itex]\Re[/itex]2 [itex]\rightarrow[/itex] [itex]\Re[/itex]2

Thanks.

Hey DmytriE.

Basically the LHS of the arrow is your starting space and the RHS is your target space. In other words we are starting in R^2 (2D vector with real numbers in each element) and we are going to a 2D vector.

In terms x -> Ax, this means that we start with a vector x and then we apply the operator A to the vector x by calculating Ax using normal matrix multiplication to get a new vector (still in R^2) called x' where x' = Ax.
 
The technical terms for "starting space" and "target space" are "domain" and "codomain". The notation ##\mathbb R## (\mathbb R) is more common than ##\Re## (\Re).

It strikes me as a bit odd to write "##T_1:\mathbb R^2\to\mathbb R^2## by ##x\to Ax##". The notation ##T_1:\mathbb R^2\to\mathbb R^2## tells us that ##T_1## is a function with domain ##\mathbb R^2## and codomain ##\mathbb R^2##. The notation ##x\to Ax## should mean "the function that takes x to Ax". Wouldn't you denote that function by A? Hm, I guess that the most likely explanation is that A is a matrix, and the person who wrote this would like to emphasize that the linear operator T1 that corresponds to the matrix A isn't the same thing as A (even though T1 acting on x gives us the same result as A times x).

By the way, I prefer to use the \mapsto arrow in the second notation, i.e. I would write ##x\mapsto Ax## instead of ##x\to Ax##. Some people prefer to never use the mapsto arrow. That's OK too.
 
I was trying to us the \mapsto arrow but when I clicked on it it gave me the bidirectional arrow and I did not know it's proper name so I just selected the normal arrow.

Here is another thing that confused me and my professor explained but I guess I was unable to grasp it. What is the difference between onto and one-to-one? What quantities would you look at to determine if it is one-to-one or onto (i.e. Null(A) or Col(A))? An example would help a lot.