What Does the Future of Virtual Reality Hold?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion explores the future of virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR), including technological advancements, societal implications, and philosophical considerations. Participants share their thoughts on the potential of these technologies, their integration into daily life, and the impact on human perception and scientific engagement.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express skepticism about the immediate future of VR, suggesting that while technology is improving, it may take time for widespread adoption.
  • Others argue that AR has more immediate potential, highlighting recent advancements in AR applications that could enhance everyday experiences.
  • Concerns are raised about the blurring of lines between reality and simulated experiences, particularly in how media influences public perception of scientific concepts.
  • One participant discusses the philosophical implications of consciousness transfer to machines, proposing that this could lead to a preference for virtual realities over physical existence.
  • There is speculation about the societal consequences of such technologies, including potential elitism in access and a decline in scientific inquiry as people may prioritize virtual experiences.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus; there are multiple competing views regarding the future of VR and AR, the implications of technology on society, and the nature of reality itself.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes various assumptions about technological capabilities and societal reactions that remain unresolved. The potential for consciousness transfer and its implications are speculative and depend on future advancements that are not yet established.

  • #31
ryan_m_b said:
And that's assuming that simulating these signals without simulating the brain (and body and environment) will actually lead to a simulation of you.

Yes. The whole notion is a gross simplification of the whole situation. No one has been prepared to discuss the matter of continuity and the experience of this suggested transition process.
Far too glib I think.
 
Computer science news on Phys.org
  • #32
sophiecentaur said:
Yes. The whole notion is a gross simplification of the whole situation. No one has been prepared to discuss the matter of continuity and the experience of this suggested transition process.
Far too glib I think.

I think there is also far to much science fiction. People like http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ray_Kurzweil" don't exactly help either...
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
7K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K