B What does the term "age" mean in descriptions of the twin paradox?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Peter Strohmayer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Age Twin paradox
Click For Summary
In the discussion about the term "age" in the twin paradox, "age" is defined as synonymous with "proper time," indicating how old each twin appears based on their respective time-like trajectories. The relationship between synchronized clocks is explored, emphasizing that this synchronization is independent of any reference system, though the concept of "the same time" is inherently frame-dependent. The operational definition of clock synchronization is highlighted as coordinate-free, while the choice of synchronization method introduces coordinate dependence. The conversation also addresses the importance of understanding these concepts clearly, suggesting that further study of foundational texts like "Spacetime Physics" may be beneficial for those struggling with the material. The thread concludes with a reminder to avoid repetitive questions that have already been addressed.
Peter Strohmayer
Gold Member
Messages
76
Reaction score
13
TL;DR
Does it make sense, independently of any reference system, to say: "All people born at the same time and resting in different places always have the same age and always celebrate the same birthday at the same time"?
In other words: Does a reference system, in the relationship between the displays of its synchronised clocks, have a specific property that is independent of any reference system? Is this particular relation of events in the form of displays of spatially distant clocks at rest the same from the point of view of all reference systems?
 
  • Sad
Likes Sagittarius A-Star
Physics news on Phys.org
In the twin scenarios “age” is synonymous with “proper time”.
 
  • Like
Likes FactChecker, Kontilera and vanhees71
"Age" in twin paradox means how old a twin appears to be.

And the twins do not have any diseases that make a person appear to be older or younger than the person's real age.

The twins are like clocks. There is probably some reason twins are used instead of two clocks.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes FactChecker
Peter Strohmayer said:
Does a reference system, in the relationship between the displays of its synchronised clocks, have a specific property that is independent of any reference system?
Only inasmuch as there's a coordinate free definition of the clock synchronisation process. In the usual Einstein synchronisation, for example, if clock A and clock B are at mutual rest and synchronised and clock A bounces a radar pulse off clock B, the time shown on clock B at the reflection event will be half way between the times shown on A at the emission and reception events. That's completely coordinate free and all frames (and weirder coordinate systems) will agree, although the will not agree in general that A and B are in sync by their own standards.

So the coordinate free-ness comes from there being an operational definition of "synchronised". The coordinate dependence comes from there being a lot of choice over what operational procedure to use.

As @Dale says, "age" in the twin paradox is usually a synonym for "proper time since the start of the experiment".
 
  • Like
Likes cianfa72 and Dale
jartsa said:
"Age" in twin paradox means how old a twin appears to be.
I would strongly discourage the usage of the words ”appears to be” in conjunction with this. It seems to indicate that there is a subjectivity attached where the resolution is that there is no subjectivity whatsoever.
 
  • Like
Likes Nugatory, Doc Al, Dale and 2 others
Dale said:
In the twin scenarios “age” is synonymous with “proper time”.
Yes, and just to make it very clear: This implies it's independent of the choice of any (inertial or non-inertial) frame. The proper time of each twin along his time-like trajectory is
$$\tau=\int_{\lambda_1}^{\lambda_2} \mathrm{d} \lambda \sqrt{g_{\mu \nu} \dot{x}^{\mu} \dot{x}^{\nu}}, \quad \dot{x}^{\mu}=\frac{\mathrm{d}}{\mathrm{d} \lambda} x^{\mu}(\lambda).$$
 
  • Informative
Likes Dale
Peter Strohmayer said:
TL;DR Summary: Does it make sense, independently of any reference system, to say: "All people born at the same time and resting in different places always have the same age and always celebrate the same birthday at the same time"?
No, because “at the same time” is always dependent on some reference frame. Talking about “the same time” independently of any reference system is like talking about left and right without considering the direction we’re facing.
 
  • Like
Likes Dale, Orodruin and vanhees71
@Peter Strohmayer you have been asking the same question and getting the same answers over and over again in multiple threads - clearly the way we’re explaining this stuff isn’t helping you see or clear up your misunderstanding.

You might be better served by a different approach: get hold of a copy of Taylor and Wheeler’s “Spacetime Physics” and work through it from the beginning. Do not speed through the early chapters thinking you understand that basic stuff - you don’t. The first edition is legal and free on the internet, and we can help over any hard spots if you get stuck.

Please don’t just post the same old stuff here without having gone through that exercise or something similar. This thread is already on the wrong side of the forum rule about restarting closed threads and another like it won’t help anyone.

This thread is closed.
 
  • Like
Likes Doc Al, PeterDonis, vanhees71 and 2 others

Similar threads

  • · Replies 71 ·
3
Replies
71
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
3K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 70 ·
3
Replies
70
Views
6K
  • · Replies 208 ·
7
Replies
208
Views
15K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K