What Does Zero Net Force Mean For An Object's Movement?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of zero net force and its implications for an object's movement, particularly in the context of various scenarios involving cars, trucks, planes, boats, and rockets.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the meaning of zero net force and its relationship to acceleration, questioning which scenarios align with this concept. There is a focus on understanding acceleration as a vector quantity and its dependence on direction.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing hints and engaging in clarifications about the nature of acceleration and its implications for the examples given. Some guidance has been offered regarding the understanding of acceleration as a vector, but there is no explicit consensus on the interpretations of the scenarios presented.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the definitions and implications of acceleration and net force, with some confusion regarding the relationship between these concepts and the examples provided. The original poster's selections were noted as incorrect, prompting further exploration of the underlying principles.

DUCEDAWG
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Which of the following describes an object with zero net force acting on it? Choose all that apply.

A car sped along at a constant rate while making a left turn.
A truck sped up while proceeding along a straight path.
A plane slowed down while making a u-turn.
A boat accelerated at a constant rate while making a right turn.
A rocket moved at a constant speed while moving in a straight line.

I know that zero net force means that it has no acceleration, Sped up means accelerating. I picked the 1st and last one it was wrong.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi there,

DUCEDAWG said:
A rocket moved at a constant speed while moving in a straight line.

You are right by saying that an object that accelerates is necessarily submitted to external forces. Can you tell me what is the acceleration is your last example?

Cheers
 
fatra2 said:
Hi there,



You are right by saying that an object that accelerates is necessarily submitted to external forces. Can you tell me what is the acceleration is your last example?

Cheers

There isn't any acceleration acting on the rocket.
 
Hint: acceleration is not just a number. ;)
 
CompuChip said:
Hint: acceleration is not just a number. ;)

CompuChip, I truly don't understand. What do you mean acceleration is not just a number?
 
Chewy0087 said:
I think he means it's a

vector, not simply a magnitude

same as the other thread, it means it's dependent on direction, by turning you're accelerating in a new direction! Like i said in the other thread, and because you're accelerating F = ma

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euclidean_vector#Vectors_in_physics

So, therefore, the answer is A rocket moved at a constant speed while moving in a straight line
 
DUCEDAWG said:
So, therefore, the answer is A rocket moved at a constant speed while moving in a straight line

correcto, but are you sure you understand WHY? this is a really key key thing in understanding acceleration, velocity and vectors in general
 

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
18K
Replies
8
Views
7K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K