What Equation Should I Use for Calculating Total Impedance in RLC Circuits?

Click For Summary
To calculate total impedance in RLC circuits, two main equations are discussed: one for parallel complex impedances and another for the magnitude of impedance in parallel resistor-capacitor-inductor setups. The first equation is used for combining complex impedances, while the second is applicable for calculating the magnitude of impedance when components are connected in parallel. It is essential to first determine the individual complex impedances before applying the first equation to find the total impedance. The discussion emphasizes the necessity of using complex numbers for accurate calculations in these scenarios. Understanding the context and application of these equations is crucial for solving advanced RLC circuit problems.
Mrhu
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Hello again!

We have been given a couple of more advanced problems where the components are placed in series parallely.

Check the image, the question is regarding what equation to use, in order to calculate the total impedance of the circuit.

Homework Equations


I have stumbled upon the following equations...
Z_{tot}=\frac{1}{\frac{1}{Z_{1}}+\frac{1}{Z_{2}}}

And the same equation, only squared and partly modified

Z_{tot}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{(\frac{1}{R})^{2}+(\frac{1}{X_{L}}-\frac{1}{X_{C}})^{2}}}



The Attempt at a Solution



If you take a look at the image you will see two examples, my theory is that the second equation is valid for the first example.

But when does one use the first equation? And can the second equation be used on the second example, and vice versa?

Many thanks in advance, please do use real numbers when explaining. I am aware of the importance of complex numbers in RLC circuits we have not applied them in Physics yet.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The first equation refers to the complex resultant impedance Z if two complex impedances, Z1 and Z2 are connected in parallel. The second one shows the magnitude Z of the resultant impedance of parallel connected resistor, capacitor and inductor. The identical notation is confusing.



ehild
 
ehild said:
The first equation refers to the complex resultant impedance Z if two complex impedances, Z1 and Z2 are connected in parallel. The second one shows the magnitude Z of the resultant impedance of parallel connected resistor, capacitor and inductor. The identical notation is confusing.



ehild

Thank you for the quick reply.

Yes, it is a bit confusing.

If you look at the picture (example 2), should I first calculate the part-impedances, then add them using the first equation in order to achieve the total impedance?

Thanks ehild
 

Attachments

  • qKfUf.png
    qKfUf.png
    18.8 KB · Views: 546
Last edited:
You can not solve example 2 without using complex impedances. Yes, you need to calculate the complex Z1 and Z2 separately, then add them as complex numbers, according to the first equation.

\hat Z_1=R+iX_L

\hat Z_2=i(X_L-X_C)

The reciprocal impedances add up:

\frac{1}{\hat Z}=\frac{1}{\hat Z_1}+\frac{1}{\hat Z_2}

You get the magnitude by multiplying by the complex conjugate and then take the square root.

ehild
 
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
974
Replies
4
Views
888
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K