What exactly do you study in reactor physics?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the field of reactor physics, particularly its definition, scope, and the mathematical foundations relevant to nuclear engineering. Participants explore the relationship between reactor physics and both fission and fusion processes, as well as the educational resources available for those interested in the subject.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses interest in reactor physics and seeks clarification on its definition and scope, particularly regarding fission and fusion.
  • Another participant notes that reactor physics primarily focuses on fission systems and involves studying neutron physics through diffusion or transport theory.
  • Several classic texts on nuclear reactor theory are mentioned, including works by Bell and Glasstone, Lamarsh, and Stacey, with emphasis on their relevance to thermal reactors.
  • There is a discussion about the differences between fission and fusion engineering, highlighting the importance of plasma physics in fusion and the role of neutrons in fission reactors.
  • Participants suggest various introductory texts and resources, including recommendations for specific editions of books and online courses related to reactor physics and numerical methods.
  • One participant mentions a conflict between course selections, indicating a desire to learn numerical methods for solving differential equations relevant to reactor physics.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the focus of reactor physics on fission systems and the importance of foundational texts. However, there is no consensus on which specific introductory text is the best choice, as different participants recommend various resources based on personal experience.

Contextual Notes

Some discussions involve specific editions of textbooks and their content, indicating that certain information may be omitted in newer editions. Additionally, there is mention of course scheduling conflicts that may affect learning opportunities.

Who May Find This Useful

Students and professionals interested in nuclear engineering, particularly those focusing on reactor physics, as well as individuals seeking educational resources and foundational texts in the field.

Hercuflea
Messages
593
Reaction score
49
Hey I am a math major looking to do an REU (and later a masters/PhD.) in nuclear engineering and I am interested in the field of reactor physics. I hear it tossed around a lot but I don't really know the definition of it. I'm taking a radiation physics class next semester at a separate technological university, but I think that it is more related to materials. Does the field of reactor physics cover both fission and fusion? I am guessing you deal mostly with the reactor core in this field. Mainly I want to be able to develop a strong mathematical background and apply my knowledge from linear algebra, functional analysis, and PDE's to some computational problems in Nuclear engineering.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Hercuflea said:
Hey I am a math major looking to do an REU (and later a masters/PhD.) in nuclear engineering and I am interested in the field of reactor physics. I hear it tossed around a lot but I don't really know the definition of it. I'm taking a radiation physics class next semester at a separate technological university, but I think that it is more related to materials. Does the field of reactor physics cover both fission and fusion? I am guessing you deal mostly with the reactor core in this field. Mainly I want to be able to develop a strong mathematical background and apply my knowledge from linear algebra, functional analysis, and PDE's to some computational problems in Nuclear engineering.
In general, nuclear reactor physics is devoted to fission systems, and one studies the neutron physics, either diffusion theory or transport theory.

There are several classic texts on Nuclear Reactor Theory or Nuclear Reactor Physics:


George Bell and Samuel Glasstone, Nuclear Reactor Theory, 1968, 1970
John Lamarsh, Introduction to Nuclear Reactor Theory, 1972
Weston Stacey, Nuclear Reactor Physics, 2001
Allan F. Henry, Nuclear-Reactor Analysis, 1975

These tend to address thermal or moderated (water or graphite) reactors, which are the basis of the commercial nuclear industry. In the case of water, it's more along the lines of pressurized water as opposed to boiling water. Emphasis at the introductory level is often on diffusion theory (Helmholtz equation), and steady-state, with some introduction to kinetics (time-dependent) theory.

J. J. Duderstadt and L. J. Hamilton, Nuclear Reactor Analysis, 1976

See also - https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=243543

Duderstadt and Hamilton goes more into transport and multigroup theory. It has been typically used at the graduate level.

If one is interested in fast reactors, then Alan Walter and Albert Reynolds, Fast Breeder Reactors, 1981, would be of interest. It delves into the peculiarities and nuances unique to fast reactors.

Fusion engineering deals with nuclear interactions of charged particles, nuclei and electrons, and the fusion reaction is obviously different from fission. In addition, one has to be familiar with plasma physics. Neutrons are not so important with respect to the plasma, but they are important in regard to the surrounding structure and blanket region of a fusion reactor.
 
Hey Astronuc,

Thanks for the detailed reply. Which of these books would you recommend as an introduction? By the way I recognized Weston Stacey, he's a professor at Ga Tech (that's where I'll be taking the radiation physics class next semester as a transient student.)
 
For just an introduction you might consider Glasstone and Sesonske's classic "Nuclear Reactor Engineering"

but i suggest the 1967 edition because it has a lot of practical information about the reactor systems that wasn't in Lamarsch when i took the course in 1968.


https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0026MFBB8/?tag=pfamazon01-20

The newer edition omits a whole section on reactor instrumentation.
This old one is inexpensive, $11 a place or two on Ebay.
But look for that Yankee plant on the cover. The new orange starburst edition was a disappointment to me.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hercuflea said:
Hey Astronuc,

Thanks for the detailed reply. Which of these books would you recommend as an introduction? By the way I recognized Weston Stacey, he's a professor at Ga Tech (that's where I'll be taking the radiation physics class next semester as a transient student.)
Perhaps Stacey's book would be good.

MIT uses Elmer L. Lewis, Fundamentals of Nuclear Reactor Physics. (Academic Press, 2008. ISBN: 9780123706317) in their undergraduate Neutron Science and Reactor Physics.
http://ocw.mit.edu/courses/nuclear-...ience-and-reactor-physics-fall-2009/index.htm

Then there is Engineering of Nuclear Systems
http://ocw.mit.edu/courses/nuclear-engineering/22-06-engineering-of-nuclear-systems-fall-2010/

Other nuclear engineering courses: http://ocw.mit.edu/courses/nuclear-engineering/index.htm

There is a simple introductory book - http://www.nr.titech.ac.jp/coe21/eng/events/NuclReactorTheoryTextbook.pdf
 
I'd also recommend this course that has notes and I believe some lectures on reactor physics and other subjects in Nuclear Engineering. http://www.nuceng.ca/ep4d3/ep4d3home.htm

I'd also suggest looking a bit into numerical methods for solving differential equations.
 
Thermalne said:
I'd also recommend this course that has notes and I believe some lectures on reactor physics and other subjects in Nuclear Engineering. http://www.nuceng.ca/ep4d3/ep4d3home.htm

I'd also suggest looking a bit into numerical methods for solving differential equations.

Damn, I had to choose between that course and the radiation physics course next semester because they were at the same time. Oh well, Ill pick up numerical methods next year.
 
Hercuflea said:
Damn, I had to choose between that course and the radiation physics course next semester because they were at the same time. Oh well, Ill pick up numerical methods next year.

Don't worry about it now. It shouldn't hinder you in learning the physics behind it all.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 70 ·
3
Replies
70
Views
11K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K