What explains the current flow in a LC circuit?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on understanding the flow of current in an LC circuit, particularly the behavior of current and voltage at the moment when the capacitor has zero charge. It explains that while the inductor's back electromotive force (emf) initially resists the current surge from the capacitor, the current continues to flow as the back emf diminishes. As the capacitor discharges, the magnetic field in the inductor collapses, inducing a reverse voltage that charges the capacitor in the opposite polarity. This cycle of energy transfer between the inductor and capacitor continues until energy losses dissipate the stored energy as heat. The overall phenomenon is described as "ringing" and occurs at the circuit's resonant frequency, with amplitude decay referred to as "damping."
Est120
Messages
54
Reaction score
3
TL;DR Summary
Explain why current flow keeps changing directions in a LC circuit. Use potential difference arguments.
I'm just not able to grasp the concept of a LC circuit intuitively, and yet I have found zero answers to my doubts.

I can't understand why does the current keeps flowing counter-clockwise between the 3rd and the 4th circuit (see image attached)
I know that when the capacitor has 0 charge, in that instant, "i" has a maximum value (3rd image).
The key to understand my doubt is just exactly between 3rd and 4th image. In the PRECISE moment the capacitor has 0 charge and i is maximum there is NO voltage across them, BUT there should be some sort of voltage across the inductor (because the magnetic flux changed across time, then there should be a non conservative electric field that would create a magnetic flux opposing the change) the emf across the inductor is always opposing the current flow, so How can i (current flow) keep flowing in the same direction, even though there is a emf acting in the opposite direction? Please, just use voltage arguments, i don't care about the spring-mass system analogy.
LC circuits.PNG
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Engineering news on Phys.org
The charge on the capacitor drives the current through the inductor until the charge has been transferred to the other side of the capacitor.
Est120 said:
How can i (current flow) keep flowing in the same direction, even though there is a emf acting in the opposite direction?

The inductor's back emf resists the initial surge from the capacitor but the charge on the capacitor continues to flow building up to a maximum while the resisting back emf is reduced. At maximum current which is now not changing the capacitor, the capacitor begins to discharge reducing the present current until the current goes to zero and the capacitor is again charged as it was initially.
That is, at max current, the current is no longer being resisted by the back emf so the capacitor will now discharge in the opposite direction. The inductor resists this change initially strongly only causing a small decrease in the maximum current but as before the resisting back emf now in the opposite direction slows the current to zero.

Is that clear?
 
A finite energy is circulating between the L and the C.
EL= ½⋅L⋅i2
EC= ½⋅C⋅v2
 
Have you studied calculus yet?
 
Short answer:

a) the capacitor discharges thru the inductor
b) the inductor builds up a magnetic field due to the current
c) as the capacitor discharges to Zero volts, the magnetic field collapses
d) as the field collapses it induces a voltage in the inductor
e) the polarity of the induced voltage is the reverse of the original capacitor voltage
f) this reverse voltage then charges the capacitor in the opposite polarity

The above 'reversing-polarity' process continues until the circuit losses dissipate all the stored energy as heat.

The overall process is referred to as 'Ringing' in a circuit and occurs at the circuits resonant frequency. The amplitude decay is referred to as "Damping".

Hope this helps!

Cheers,
Tom
 
I used to be an HVAC technician. One time I had a service call in which there was no power to the thermostat. The thermostat did not have power because the fuse in the air handler was blown. The fuse in the air handler was blown because there was a low voltage short. The rubber coating on one of the thermostat wires was chewed off by a rodent. The exposed metal in the thermostat wire was touching the metal cabinet of the air handler. This was a low voltage short. This low voltage...
Thread 'How Does Jaguar's 1980s V12 Dual Coil Ignition System Enhance Spark Strength?'
I have come across a dual coil ignition system as used by Jaguar on their V12 in the 1980's. It uses two ignition coils with their primary windings wired in parallel. The primary coil has its secondary winding wired to the distributor and then to the spark plugs as is standard practice. However, the auxiliary coil has it secondary winding output sealed off. The purpose of the system was to provide a stronger spark to the plugs, always a difficult task with the very short dwell time of a...
I am not an electrical engineering student, but a lowly apprentice electrician. I learn both on the job and also take classes for my apprenticeship. I recently wired my first transformer and I understand that the neutral and ground are bonded together in the transformer or in the service. What I don't understand is, if the neutral is a current carrying conductor, which is then bonded to the ground conductor, why does current only flow back to its source and not on the ground path...
Back
Top