What Force Acts Between Hemispheres of a Charged Soap Bubble?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the force acting on one hemisphere of a charged soap bubble with total charge ##Q## and radius ##R##. The correct expression for the force is derived using electrostatic pressure and Gauss' Law, leading to the conclusion that the force is given by ##F = \frac{Q^2}{8\pi\epsilon_0 R^2}##. Participants identified errors in previous calculations, particularly regarding the integration of force per unit area and the dimensions of electrostatic pressure. The final consensus emphasizes the importance of considering the radial electric field and the correct integration limits.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electrostatics, specifically Gauss' Law
  • Familiarity with electrostatic pressure and its calculation
  • Knowledge of spherical coordinates for integration
  • Basic calculus skills for performing integrals
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of electrostatic pressure in spherical shells
  • Learn about the application of Gauss' Law in electrostatics
  • Explore integration techniques in spherical coordinates
  • Research the implications of electric fields in charged objects
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in physics, particularly those focusing on electrostatics, as well as anyone involved in advanced problem-solving related to electric fields and forces in charged systems.

Buffu
Messages
849
Reaction score
146

Homework Statement



There is a total of ##Q## charge on soap bubble of radius ##R##. What force is acting on one hemisphere by the other ?

Homework Equations



Electrostatic pressure is ##P_e = 2\pi \sigma^2## for a spherical shell.

The Attempt at a Solution



##P_e = F/A##

therefore ##F = AP_e = 2{A\over 2}\pi\sigma^2 = A \pi {Q^2 \over A^2} = {\pi Q^2 \over A} = {\pi Q^2 \over 4 \pi R^2} = {Q^2 \over 4\pi} ##

Given answer is ##{Q^2 \over \color{red}{8}\pi}##.

Where did I go wrong ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First, your expression for electrostatic pressure is incorrect. It has the wrong dimensions. I suggest considering the force per unit area on the bubble which is, because the E field only has a radial component, $$F_r=E_r\sigma$$
By Gauss' Law, the R field just outside the surface is,$$E=\frac{Q}{4\pi\epsilon_0 R^2}$$
and the field inside the surface is zero. If you integrate the z component of force per unit area over one hemisphere you'll get the total force acting on it I.e.$$F=\left (\frac{Q}{4\pi \epsilon_0 R^2}\right )\sigma\left (2\pi R^2\right )\int_0^{\frac{\pi}{2}}cos\left (\theta\right )sin\left (\theta\right )d\theta= \frac{Q^2}{8\pi\epsilon_0 R^2}$$
 
Fred Wright said:
It has the wrong dimensions. I suggest considering the force per unit area on the bubble which is,because the E field only has a radial component,
Fr=Erσ​

Can you explain how you got this ?

Think you did,
Force per unit area is ##F/A = qE/A = \sigma E ##

Am I correct ?
 
Fred Wright said:
z component of force per unit area
What happened to x, y component ?
 
Yes, the force per unit area on the bubble is the E field multiplied by the change density. The total force between the two hemispheres is in the z direction.
I made a mistake in the integration by dropping a factor of 1/2. The answer I get is$$\frac{Q^2}{16\pi \epsilon_0 R^2}$$
Sorry:)
 
Fred Wright said:
Yes, the force per unit area on the bubble is the E field multiplied by the change density. The total force between the two hemispheres is in the z direction.
I made a mistake in the integration by dropping a factor of 1/2. The answer I get is$$\frac{Q^2}{16\pi \epsilon_0 R^2}$$
Sorry:)

SInce you gave the expression for total then the answer should be ##\displaystyle {Q^2 \over 4R^2}## but this does not match the given answer ?

I took ##k=1## since the unit used in the book is cgs.
 
Fred Wright said:
Yes, the force per unit area on the bubble is the E field multiplied by the change density. The total force between the two hemispheres is in the z direction.
I made a mistake in the integration by dropping a factor of 1/2. The answer I get is$$\frac{Q^2}{16\pi \epsilon_0 R^2}$$
Sorry:)
From your integral I get $$\frac{Q^2}{4\pi \epsilon_0 R^2}$$
 
Fred Wright said:
I suggest considering the force per unit area on the bubble which is, because the E field only has a radial component, $$F_r=E_r\sigma$$
The force per unit area is ##\frac{1}{2}E_r\sigma##, where ##E_r## is the field at the outer surface of the bubble. The reason for the factor of 1/2 takes some thought.

For a derivation see http://phys.columbia.edu/~nicolis/Surface_Force.pdf The result is given in equations (13) and (14) of this link. For the bubble, Ebelow of equation (14) is zero.

A different (somewhat hand-wavy) derivation is given in http://www.physicspages.com/2011/10/31/electrostatic-pressure/
 
Last edited:
TSny said:
The force per unit area is ##\frac{1}{2}E_r\sigma##, where ##E_r## is the field at the outer surface of the bubble. The reason for the factor of 1/2 takes some thought.

For a derivation see http://phys.columbia.edu/~nicolis/Surface_Force.pdf The result is given in equations (13) and (14) of this link. For the bubble, Ebelow of equation (14) is zero.

A different (somewhat hand-wavy) derivation is given in http://www.physicspages.com/2011/10/31/electrostatic-pressure/

##F = {1\over 2}E\pi \sigma = {1\over 2}4\pi\sigma^2 = 2\pi\sigma^2##

I used this and I got wrong answer :(.
 
  • #10
TSny said:
The force per unit area is ##\frac{1}{2}E_r\sigma##, where ##E_r## is the field at the outer surface of the bubble. The reason for the factor of 1/2 takes some thought.

For a derivation see http://phys.columbia.edu/~nicolis/Surface_Force.pdf The result is given in equations (13) and (14) of this link. For the bubble, Ebelow of equation (14) is zero.

A different (somewhat hand-wavy) derivation is given in http://www.physicspages.com/2011/10/31/electrostatic-pressure/

Oh I need to integrate over the hemisphere with this to get the answer but why can't I just multiple with this with the area ?
 
  • #11
The forces on different patches of area point in different directions.

It is possible to show that the answer can be obtained by multiplying the pressure by the area of a circle of radius equal to the radius of the hemisphere. Consider a solid, uncharged hemisphere acted on all sides by a uniform atmospheric pressure. We know that the hemisphere does not accelerate off in some direction. So, the force of the pressure on the curved surface of the hemisphere must be equal and opposite to the force of the pressure on the flat surface of the hemisphere.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Buffu
  • #12
TSny said:
The forces on different patches of area point in different directions.

It is possible to show that the answer can be obtained by multiplying the pressure by the area of a circle of radius equal to the radius of the hemisphere. Consider a solid, uncharged hemisphere acted on all sides by a uniform atmospheric pressure. We know that the hemisphere does not accelerate off in some direction. So, the force of the pressure on the curved surface of the hemisphere must be equal and opposite to the force of the pressure on the flat surface of the hemisphere.

I got ##dF = 2\pi \sigma^2 \cos \theta dA##

Changing to spherical coordinate,

##\displaystyle F = 2\pi\sigma^2R^2 \int^{2\pi}_{0}\int^{\pi/2}_{0}\cos \theta \sin \theta d\theta d\phi = {Q^2 \over 8R^2}##

But I want to do this without change to spherical coordinates, how can I do that ?

My issue is I am not able to express ##dA## into something useful.
 
  • #13
Buffu said:
I got ##dF = 2\pi \sigma^2 \cos \theta dA##
OK

Changing to spherical coordinate,

##\displaystyle F = 2\pi\sigma^2R^2 \int^{2\pi}_{0}\int^{\pi/2}_{0}\cos \theta \sin \theta d\theta d\phi = {Q^2 \over 8R^2}##
OK

But I want to do this without change to spherical coordinates, how can I do that ?

My issue is I am not able to express ##dA## into something useful.
Spherical coordinates are the natural coordinates for doing the integration. However, you can avoid having to do any integration by giving a geometrical interpretation to ##dA\cos \theta##. The figure below shows how to interpret this as a projection of a patch of area of the sphere onto a horizontal surface. So, summing all the ##dA\cos \theta## for the hemisphere is the same as summing all the horizontally projected areas. The sum of the projected areas is seen by inspection without having to perform an integration.
upload_2017-5-3_10-55-2.png
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Buffu
  • #14
TSny said:
OK

OK

Spherical coordinates are the natural coordinates for doing the integration. However, you can avoid having to do any integration by giving a geometrical interpretation to ##dA\cos \theta##. The figure below shows how to interpret this as a projection of a patch of area of the sphere onto a horizontal surface. So, summing all the ##dA\cos \theta## for the hemisphere is the same as summing all the horizontally projected areas. The sum of the projected areas is seen by inspection without having to perform an integration.
View attachment 198140

Yes Thank you for the answer and the diagram really explains the thing.

The limits for the integration would be ##0 \to \pi/2## right ?
 
  • #15
Buffu said:
The limits for the integration would be ##0 \to \pi/2## right ?
Yes, that would be the limits for ##\theta##.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
632
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
824