What Force Acts Between Hemispheres of a Charged Soap Bubble?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the forces acting between the hemispheres of a charged soap bubble, specifically focusing on the electrostatic interactions and pressure involved. The problem involves understanding the electrostatic pressure and how it relates to the force exerted on one hemisphere by the other, with a total charge denoted as ##Q## and a radius ##R##.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the expression for electrostatic pressure and its implications for calculating the force between hemispheres. There are attempts to derive the force using different approaches, including Gauss' Law and integration techniques. Questions arise regarding the correctness of dimensions and the integration process, as well as the interpretation of force per unit area.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with various participants providing insights and corrections to each other's reasoning. Some participants have offered alternative methods for calculating the force, while others have pointed out potential errors in previous calculations. There is a recognition of the complexity involved in integrating over the hemisphere and the need for careful consideration of the geometry involved.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of a homework problem, which may limit the information available and the assumptions that can be made. There is an acknowledgment of differing interpretations of the electrostatic pressure and its application to the problem at hand.

Buffu
Messages
851
Reaction score
147

Homework Statement



There is a total of ##Q## charge on soap bubble of radius ##R##. What force is acting on one hemisphere by the other ?

Homework Equations



Electrostatic pressure is ##P_e = 2\pi \sigma^2## for a spherical shell.

The Attempt at a Solution



##P_e = F/A##

therefore ##F = AP_e = 2{A\over 2}\pi\sigma^2 = A \pi {Q^2 \over A^2} = {\pi Q^2 \over A} = {\pi Q^2 \over 4 \pi R^2} = {Q^2 \over 4\pi} ##

Given answer is ##{Q^2 \over \color{red}{8}\pi}##.

Where did I go wrong ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First, your expression for electrostatic pressure is incorrect. It has the wrong dimensions. I suggest considering the force per unit area on the bubble which is, because the E field only has a radial component, $$F_r=E_r\sigma$$
By Gauss' Law, the R field just outside the surface is,$$E=\frac{Q}{4\pi\epsilon_0 R^2}$$
and the field inside the surface is zero. If you integrate the z component of force per unit area over one hemisphere you'll get the total force acting on it I.e.$$F=\left (\frac{Q}{4\pi \epsilon_0 R^2}\right )\sigma\left (2\pi R^2\right )\int_0^{\frac{\pi}{2}}cos\left (\theta\right )sin\left (\theta\right )d\theta= \frac{Q^2}{8\pi\epsilon_0 R^2}$$
 
Fred Wright said:
It has the wrong dimensions. I suggest considering the force per unit area on the bubble which is,because the E field only has a radial component,
Fr=Erσ​

Can you explain how you got this ?

Think you did,
Force per unit area is ##F/A = qE/A = \sigma E ##

Am I correct ?
 
Fred Wright said:
z component of force per unit area
What happened to x, y component ?
 
Yes, the force per unit area on the bubble is the E field multiplied by the change density. The total force between the two hemispheres is in the z direction.
I made a mistake in the integration by dropping a factor of 1/2. The answer I get is$$\frac{Q^2}{16\pi \epsilon_0 R^2}$$
Sorry:)
 
Fred Wright said:
Yes, the force per unit area on the bubble is the E field multiplied by the change density. The total force between the two hemispheres is in the z direction.
I made a mistake in the integration by dropping a factor of 1/2. The answer I get is$$\frac{Q^2}{16\pi \epsilon_0 R^2}$$
Sorry:)

SInce you gave the expression for total then the answer should be ##\displaystyle {Q^2 \over 4R^2}## but this does not match the given answer ?

I took ##k=1## since the unit used in the book is cgs.
 
Fred Wright said:
Yes, the force per unit area on the bubble is the E field multiplied by the change density. The total force between the two hemispheres is in the z direction.
I made a mistake in the integration by dropping a factor of 1/2. The answer I get is$$\frac{Q^2}{16\pi \epsilon_0 R^2}$$
Sorry:)
From your integral I get $$\frac{Q^2}{4\pi \epsilon_0 R^2}$$
 
Fred Wright said:
I suggest considering the force per unit area on the bubble which is, because the E field only has a radial component, $$F_r=E_r\sigma$$
The force per unit area is ##\frac{1}{2}E_r\sigma##, where ##E_r## is the field at the outer surface of the bubble. The reason for the factor of 1/2 takes some thought.

For a derivation see http://phys.columbia.edu/~nicolis/Surface_Force.pdf The result is given in equations (13) and (14) of this link. For the bubble, Ebelow of equation (14) is zero.

A different (somewhat hand-wavy) derivation is given in http://www.physicspages.com/2011/10/31/electrostatic-pressure/
 
Last edited:
TSny said:
The force per unit area is ##\frac{1}{2}E_r\sigma##, where ##E_r## is the field at the outer surface of the bubble. The reason for the factor of 1/2 takes some thought.

For a derivation see http://phys.columbia.edu/~nicolis/Surface_Force.pdf The result is given in equations (13) and (14) of this link. For the bubble, Ebelow of equation (14) is zero.

A different (somewhat hand-wavy) derivation is given in http://www.physicspages.com/2011/10/31/electrostatic-pressure/

##F = {1\over 2}E\pi \sigma = {1\over 2}4\pi\sigma^2 = 2\pi\sigma^2##

I used this and I got wrong answer :(.
 
  • #10
TSny said:
The force per unit area is ##\frac{1}{2}E_r\sigma##, where ##E_r## is the field at the outer surface of the bubble. The reason for the factor of 1/2 takes some thought.

For a derivation see http://phys.columbia.edu/~nicolis/Surface_Force.pdf The result is given in equations (13) and (14) of this link. For the bubble, Ebelow of equation (14) is zero.

A different (somewhat hand-wavy) derivation is given in http://www.physicspages.com/2011/10/31/electrostatic-pressure/

Oh I need to integrate over the hemisphere with this to get the answer but why can't I just multiple with this with the area ?
 
  • #11
The forces on different patches of area point in different directions.

It is possible to show that the answer can be obtained by multiplying the pressure by the area of a circle of radius equal to the radius of the hemisphere. Consider a solid, uncharged hemisphere acted on all sides by a uniform atmospheric pressure. We know that the hemisphere does not accelerate off in some direction. So, the force of the pressure on the curved surface of the hemisphere must be equal and opposite to the force of the pressure on the flat surface of the hemisphere.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Buffu
  • #12
TSny said:
The forces on different patches of area point in different directions.

It is possible to show that the answer can be obtained by multiplying the pressure by the area of a circle of radius equal to the radius of the hemisphere. Consider a solid, uncharged hemisphere acted on all sides by a uniform atmospheric pressure. We know that the hemisphere does not accelerate off in some direction. So, the force of the pressure on the curved surface of the hemisphere must be equal and opposite to the force of the pressure on the flat surface of the hemisphere.

I got ##dF = 2\pi \sigma^2 \cos \theta dA##

Changing to spherical coordinate,

##\displaystyle F = 2\pi\sigma^2R^2 \int^{2\pi}_{0}\int^{\pi/2}_{0}\cos \theta \sin \theta d\theta d\phi = {Q^2 \over 8R^2}##

But I want to do this without change to spherical coordinates, how can I do that ?

My issue is I am not able to express ##dA## into something useful.
 
  • #13
Buffu said:
I got ##dF = 2\pi \sigma^2 \cos \theta dA##
OK

Changing to spherical coordinate,

##\displaystyle F = 2\pi\sigma^2R^2 \int^{2\pi}_{0}\int^{\pi/2}_{0}\cos \theta \sin \theta d\theta d\phi = {Q^2 \over 8R^2}##
OK

But I want to do this without change to spherical coordinates, how can I do that ?

My issue is I am not able to express ##dA## into something useful.
Spherical coordinates are the natural coordinates for doing the integration. However, you can avoid having to do any integration by giving a geometrical interpretation to ##dA\cos \theta##. The figure below shows how to interpret this as a projection of a patch of area of the sphere onto a horizontal surface. So, summing all the ##dA\cos \theta## for the hemisphere is the same as summing all the horizontally projected areas. The sum of the projected areas is seen by inspection without having to perform an integration.
upload_2017-5-3_10-55-2.png
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Buffu
  • #14
TSny said:
OK

OK

Spherical coordinates are the natural coordinates for doing the integration. However, you can avoid having to do any integration by giving a geometrical interpretation to ##dA\cos \theta##. The figure below shows how to interpret this as a projection of a patch of area of the sphere onto a horizontal surface. So, summing all the ##dA\cos \theta## for the hemisphere is the same as summing all the horizontally projected areas. The sum of the projected areas is seen by inspection without having to perform an integration.
View attachment 198140

Yes Thank you for the answer and the diagram really explains the thing.

The limits for the integration would be ##0 \to \pi/2## right ?
 
  • #15
Buffu said:
The limits for the integration would be ##0 \to \pi/2## right ?
Yes, that would be the limits for ##\theta##.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
5K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
879