What fraction of its kinetic energy is rotational?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a sphere rolling down an incline, focusing on its angular velocity and the fraction of its kinetic energy that is rotational. The subject area includes concepts of rotational dynamics and energy conservation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the relationship between gravitational potential energy and the sum of linear and rotational kinetic energy. There is mention of using the moment of inertia and angular velocity in the context of rolling motion. Some participants express confusion about the concepts being discussed.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into the equations related to kinetic energy and conservation of energy principles. However, there is still uncertainty among participants regarding the application of these concepts to find the desired fraction of kinetic energy.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working within the constraints of a homework assignment, which may limit the information they can use or the methods they can apply. There is an emphasis on understanding the mechanics of rolling without slipping.

spoon
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
An 8.90-cm-diameter, 310 g sphere is released from rest at the top of a 2.00-m-long, 17 degree incline. It rolls, without slipping, to the bottom.

a) What is the sphere's angular velocity at the bottom of the incline?
b) What fraction of its kinetic energy is rotational?

If someone could help me out, it'd be great...I'm not exactly sure how to tackle this problem...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
To start off...

Gravitational Potential Energy = Linear Kinetic Energy + Rotational Kinetic Energy

...Rotational Kinetic Energy = 1/2 I w^2

w(its called omega) = v/r

I of Sphere = (2/5)mr^2...

..thusly...Rotational Kinetic Energy = (1/2)[(2/5)mr^2][v/r]^2...which simplifies to..
...(1/10)mv^2

Work from there...
 
anaylizing both movement rotational and linear we should consider a kinetic energy of the sum of both the linear of its center of mass and the rotational. Apply Conservation of Mechanical Energy because it's pure rolling motion (no slipping).
 
Last edited:
I kind of get what you're saying but I'm still sort of lost?
 
Actually now I got part A...I just need part B...
Thanks for the help by the way
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
20
Views
21K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K