What is the frequency of a police siren when you run away from it?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ThePhysicsXV
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Frequency
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves determining the frequency of a police siren as perceived by an observer running away from the source. The context includes the Doppler effect, with a police car approaching at a speed of 23 m/s and the observer running away at 7 m/s, while the temperature is given as 28°C.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the appropriate formula for the Doppler effect and question the roles of the observer and source. There is confusion regarding the direction of motion and how it affects frequency detection. Some participants suggest breaking down the problem into parts to analyze the effects of each motion separately.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, raising questions about the correct application of the Doppler effect formula. Some guidance has been provided regarding the roles of the observer and source, and there is an ongoing exploration of how to apply the equations correctly.

Contextual Notes

There are mentions of potential confusion regarding the speed of sound and its calculation based on temperature, as well as the need to clarify the assumptions about the movements of the police car and the observer.

ThePhysicsXV
Messages
35
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Temperature is 28C, a police car with a siren blazing at 988Hz is coming toward you at 23m/s so you run away at
7m/s.

Homework Equations



f=f(v+-o/v+-s)

The Attempt at a Solution


I'm confuse on the formula.
 

Attachments

  • image.jpg
    image.jpg
    32.6 KB · Views: 444
Physics news on Phys.org
What specifically is confusing you?
 
vela said:
What specifically is confusing you?
I know how to solve to get the speed of sound but are they moving forward (+) or backward (-) and what's is the observer and source. Is the source the police siren?
 
vela said:
What specifically is confusing you?
Do I use the formula I gave or the one from the picture?
 
The observer is what detects the sound. The source is what produces the sound the observer hears.

Consider the two motions separately. What effect does the motion of the police car have on the frequency detected, and what effect does your movement have on the frequency detected?
 
vela said:
The observer is what detects the sound. The source is what produces the sound the observer hears.

Consider the two motions separately. What effect does the motion of the police car have on the frequency detected, and what effect does your movement have on the frequency detected?

So is V = 988(348+7/ 348+8)
Or V=988(348-7/348-23)?
 
ThePhysicsXV said:
So is V = 988(348+7/ 348+8)
Or V=988(348-7/348-23)?
348m/s is the speed of sound
 
Instead of plugging numbers in randomly, please answer the questions.
 
vela said:
Instead of plugging numbers in randomly, please answer the questions.
I have no idea how to answer your question.
 
  • #10
ThePhysicsXV said:
I know how to solve to get the speed of sound but are they moving forward (+) or backward (-) and what's is the observer and source. Is the source the police siren?
How would you "solve to get the speed of sound"? The speed of sound is a given.
As vela says, the source is the siren, you are the observer.
Are the source and observer moving in the same direction or in opposite directions?

As vela suggests, try it in two parts. First, what frequency did you hear before starting to run? Can you quote an equation for the Doppler effect?
 
  • #11
haruspex said:
How would you "solve to get the speed of sound"? The speed of sound is a given.
As vela says, the source is the siren, you are the observer.
Are the source and observer moving in the same direction or in opposite directions?

As vela suggests, try it in two parts. First, what frequency did you hear before starting to run? Can you quote an equation for the Doppler effect?
The source and observer are moving on the same direction since the police car coming toward you, and you getting away.

V sound in air = 331.4 + 0.6T
T is temperature so temp=28
And you will get 348m/s
 
  • #12
ThePhysicsXV said:
The source and observer are moving on the same direction since the police car coming toward you, and you getting away.

V sound in air = 331.4 + 0.6T
T is temperature so temp=28
And you will get 348m/s
Ok, but what about the Doppler effect? So far, I see no evidence that you've even heard of it.
 
  • #13
haruspex said:
Ok, but what about the Doppler effect? So far, I see no evidence that you've even heard of it.

Doppler Effect for Moving Source and Observer
ƒ'=ƒ((1±u₀/v)/(1±u(sound)/v))
 
  • #14
ThePhysicsXV said:
Doppler Effect for Moving Source and Observer
ƒ'=ƒ((1±u₀/v)/(1±u(sound)/v))
Ok, so apply that.
 
  • #15
haruspex said:
Ok, so apply that to the case where the car is approaching you but you are standing still.
Actually they both moving at different speeds. Police at 23m/s and "you" at 7m/s
 
  • #16
ThePhysicsXV said:
Actually they both moving at different speeds. Police at 23m/s and "you" at 7m/s
Yes, I replied a little too quickly, then edited it.
I anticipated that you would quote a formula for only one movement, so I was trying to get you to solve it in the two stages, as vela had suggested. When I realized your equation allowed for both moving I edited my post, but you were too quick for me.
So, apply the equation.
 
  • #17
haruspex said:
Yes, I replied a little too quickly, then edited it.
I anticipated that you would quote a formula for only one movement, so I was trying to get you to solve it in the two stages, as vela had suggested. When I realized your equation allowed for both moving I edited my post, but you were too quick for me.
So, apply the equation.

f=988(348+7/348+23)
f= 945Hz
 
  • #18
haruspex said:
Yes, I replied a little too quickly, then edited it.
I anticipated that you would quote a formula for only one movement, so I was trying to get you to solve it in the two stages, as vela had suggested. When I realized your equation allowed for both moving I edited my post, but you were too quick for me.
So, apply the equation.
 

Attachments

  • image.jpg
    image.jpg
    31.1 KB · Views: 431
  • #19
I did have some concerns about the equation you posted previously, but I wanted to see how you applied it. The equations in the image you have attached look fine, except that you should ignore the references to "Stationary" observer. That makes no sense given the rest of the text. It's probably a cut-and-paste error from some preceding cases.
So, which of the two cases in the image do you think applies here? What do you get when you apply it?
 
  • #20
haruspex said:
I did have some concerns about the equation you posted previously, but I wanted to see how you applied it. The equations in the image you have attached look fine, except that you should ignore the references to "Stationary" observer. That makes no sense given the rest of the text. It's probably a cut-and-paste error from some preceding cases.
So, which of the two cases in the image do you think applies here? What do you get when you apply it?
f= f(v-o/v-s)
I got 1036.64Hz
 
  • #21
ThePhysicsXV said:
f= f(v-o/v-s)
I got 1036.64Hz
I get the same. Round that to the appropriate number of digits.
 
  • #22
haruspex said:
I get the same. Round that to the appropriate number of digits.
Okay, I guess that's the correct answer. But Thank you sir for your help
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
11K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K