Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

On shell and off shell simultaneously?

  1. Feb 28, 2016 #1

    CAF123

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    I am considering the following one loop virtual correction in the DIS process.

    OpgEl.png

    where I have a quark of momentum ##p## coming in, emitting a gluon before interacting with a photon of momentum ##q## to produce a fermionic propagator with momentum ##p+q##. My question is, in the red box, I have an on shell initial or final state quark ##p^2=0## but in the green box I have an off shell fermionic quark propagator ##p^2 \neq 0##.

    So, in my equations, in particular upon evaluation of the loop integral $$\int d^D l \frac{\text{Tr}( \not p \gamma^{\nu} (\not p + \not q) \dots)}{p^2 (p+q)^2 (p-l)^2}$$ where the denominators are all off shell terms, in simplifying the numerator (the trace results in dot products of all the momenta scales in the problem) would I use ##p^2=0## or ##p^2 \neq 0##?
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Feb 28, 2016 #2

    mfb

    User Avatar
    2016 Award

    Staff: Mentor

    p should be the same as p, I don't see how it could be off-shell if the gluon is connected as in the diagram.
     
  4. Feb 28, 2016 #3

    CAF123

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    I should have maybe drawn it with a cut through the propagator p+q. I want to compute the hadronic tensor for this diagram which is the discontinuity of the forward scattering process I showed. Does that make more sense in the set up?
     
    Last edited: Feb 28, 2016
  5. Feb 28, 2016 #4
    This diagram, is the 1PI insertion onto the external leg.

    Normally, the approach is to renormalise the wave functions in the on shell scheme.

    In this set up, this diagram is cancelled with that of the UV counterterm inserted onto this leg exactly.

    In which case, you never need to calculate this diagram ever.

    You would have to consider this gluon type attachment in the internal propagator. This would be off-shell, and would require the mass counterterm (the CT for a fermion propagator) to cancel the UV pole.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: On shell and off shell simultaneously?
  1. Shell model (Replies: 1)

  2. Off shell decay (Replies: 1)

Loading...