What Happens to Divergence When Field Lines Change Length?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the concept of divergence in vector fields, specifically how changes in field line length affect divergence values. A scenario is presented where a vector field has negative divergence due to more flux entering a surface than exiting. However, when field lines are shorter on the outside and longer towards the origin, it creates a situation where more flux appears to exit, suggesting positive divergence. The response clarifies that divergence can vary within a field, indicating that it can be positive at the surface while remaining negative at the center. This highlights the complexity of divergence in relation to the overall behavior of the vector field.
DunWorry
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
Hey guys!

So I've been trying to get my head around Divergence of a vector field. I do get the general idea, however I thought of a hypothetical situation I can't get my head around. Look at the second vector field on this page, http://mathinsight.org/divergence_idea

it has a negative divergence. It makes sense because if you take a circular surface and measure the flux, there is more flux going into the sphere then going out. Also you can see as a whole the field is compressing towards the origin. However what happens if you take the same vector field, but the field lines are shorter on the outside and get longer towards the origin?

This means if I take a surface and measure the flux, more flux is going out than in because the field lines are longer towards the origin. This suggests a positive divergence, however looking at the field as a whole its clear the field is compressing towards the origin at an accelerating rate so the divergence should be negative?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In your case, the divergence would be positive at the surface and negative at the center. The divergence doesn't have to have the same value everywhere.
 
I do not have a good working knowledge of physics yet. I tried to piece this together but after researching this, I couldn’t figure out the correct laws of physics to combine to develop a formula to answer this question. Ex. 1 - A moving object impacts a static object at a constant velocity. Ex. 2 - A moving object impacts a static object at the same velocity but is accelerating at the moment of impact. Assuming the mass of the objects is the same and the velocity at the moment of impact...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
17K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
10K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
1K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
13K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K