What happens when a wavelength is longer than the length of coax?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ThunderStorm
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Length Wavelength
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the implications of using coaxial cables for long wavelengths, particularly in relation to the claims made in the paper "Long Waves Do Not Exist in a Transmission Line." Participants assert that while coaxial cables can transmit low-frequency signals, the semantics of discussing "waves" in this context are misleading. The consensus is that Maxwell's equations remain applicable regardless of wavelength, and the presence of EM wave energy in the cable dielectric is measurable. The debate highlights the practical use of coaxial cables for frequencies down to DC, countering the paper's assertions about the non-existence of long wavelengths in transmission lines.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of TEM modes in coaxial cables
  • Familiarity with Maxwell's equations
  • Knowledge of signal transmission and attenuation in coaxial cables
  • Basic concepts of wave propagation and standing waves
NEXT STEPS
  • Research "Maxwell's equations in transmission lines" for deeper insights into wave behavior.
  • Study "Coaxial cable characteristics and applications" to understand practical uses.
  • Examine "Signal integrity in low-frequency applications" to explore performance issues.
  • Investigate "Standing wave ratio (SWR) in transmission lines" for practical measurement techniques.
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineers, telecommunications professionals, and anyone involved in the design and analysis of coaxial cable systems, particularly in low-frequency applications.

ThunderStorm
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
We are all taught that the TEM modes in coax have no low frequency cut-off. So this would suggest that nothing different happens for very long wavelengths that are longer than the coax itself.

However, in this rather shocking paper here: http://vixra.org/pdf/1403.0964v5.pdf

...it is suggested that long waves do not exist in a transmission line! Am I reading this paper correctly?

I agree if the ends are shorted, there can be no standing waves longer than the length of the cable (obviously), however, the above paper appears to be talking generally for all circumstances. Am I reading this correctly?

Any idea exactly where this paper goes wrong? What is the most succinct way to counter the claim in the paper?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Engineering news on Phys.org
I think long wavelengths means it's practically DC.
 
I am not even sure what the issue is. Coaxial cable can obviously be used for whatever frequency you want up to (and sometime over) the modding frequency; there are sometimes practical issues with attenuation etc but those are not fundamental.
Whether or not you talk about "waves" when the wavelength is much longer than the cable is just a question of semantics; Maxwell's equations are always valid so there is nothing stopping you from applying them even if you are technically in the lumped element regime.

I assume I don't have to point out that coaxial cables are very often used for very low frequency signals (all the way down to DC), this is (hopefully) something everyone has experience of (most people get to play with an oscilloscope at some point in school)
 
I think the paper is about the semantics of the English language, not about physics.
 
The fact that only a small portion of the 'wave' is present on the short cable at anyone time only means the distributed lump element effects of the electrical characteristics of the cable are minute if losses are low and the cable is short not non-existent. The changing signal takes a finite amount of time to travel from point A (original signal) to B (time delayed cable modified signal) so there is a transmission of EM wave energy in the cable dielectric that also interacts with the charge carriers in the conductors that can be measured as the signal levels change across the wire. The root question of the papers seems to be can the directionally of the wave energy across the cable be used to detect the key sequence sent by modulation of noise sources. Because the key sequence information is sent by the EM waves of the noise sources on the cable, detection should be possible in a keying system that uses a lossy cable beyond a few meters by tapping the cable a two distant points. The tricky part is how to isolate the large common wave components in both signals so you can see the small difference.

http://arxiv.org/pdf/1303.7435.pdf
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
5K