B What Happens When The Applied Force Equals the Static Friction Force?

AI Thread Summary
When the applied force exceeds the maximum static friction force, the object begins to move with constant acceleration. Initially, the applied force and static friction balance each other, preventing motion. Once the applied force surpasses static friction, the object accelerates until it reaches a constant velocity, where the applied force equals kinetic friction. The difference between static and kinetic friction determines the acceleration during this transition. Thus, the key point is that acceleration occurs only when the applied force exceeds static friction.
vibha_ganji
Messages
19
Reaction score
6
In my teacher’s notes, it said that when the applied force on an object equals the maximum static frictional force, the object begins to move at constant velocity. My question is if both the applied force and the frictional force cancel as they are equal in magnitude, what force accelerates the object from zero velocity to its constant velocity?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Usually kinetic friction constant is smaller than static friction constant.
Applied force which equals the maximum static frictional force - the kinetic frictional source
would accelerate the body.
After it starts moving if applied force is lessened to equal the kinetic frictional force, it would move with constant speed.
 
  • Like
Likes Lnewqban and tech99
vibha_ganji said:
In my teacher’s notes, it said that when the applied force on an object equals the maximum static frictional force, the object begins to move at constant velocity. My question is if both the applied force and the frictional force cancel as they are equal in magnitude, what force accelerates the object from zero velocity to its constant velocity?
This doesn't sound right. It should be:

... when the applied force on an object exceeds the maximum static frictional force, the object begins to move with constant acceleration.

Note that static friction is usually greater than kinetic friction, so that you get a significant acceleration depending on how large this difference is. If the force is constant, then there is theoretically a minimum acceleration of ##\frac{f_s - f_k]{m}##, where ##f_k## is the kinetic friction, ##f_s## the static friction and ##m## the mass of the object. We assume that the applied force is approximately ##f_s## but just a tiny bit more.
 
  • Like
Likes Lnewqban and weirdoguy
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top