What if Cramer's FTL Experiment Worked?

  • Thread starter Thread starter peter0302
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Experiment Ftl
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the implications of John Cramer's proposed FTL (faster-than-light) experiment for quantum mechanics (QM) interpretations. If successful, it could support the Many-Worlds Interpretation (MWI) while challenging realistic interpretations like Bohmian mechanics and transactional interpretations. The ability to send signals backward in time raises questions about paradoxes and the nature of the universe, suggesting that only non-paradoxical signals could be sent or that a multiverse split occurs upon message reception. Participants debate whether a single-universe interpretation can coexist with retrocausality, highlighting the complexities of wavefunction changes in response to retroactive communication. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the potential for FTL communication to reshape our understanding of QM.
peter0302
Messages
876
Reaction score
3
I hope this isn't considered too speculative for your guidelines, but I'm very interested to hear what people think would be the implications for QM if Cramer's FTL experiment actually worked. Would it prove or disprove any of the current interrpetations (transactional, Bohmian, MWI)?

My thoughts were that it would tend to support MWI and refute any realistic interpretations of QM. If you can send a signal backwards in time, there are only two ways to avoid a paradox: 1) the only signals that can be sent successfully are ones that will not be affected by anything in the past; or 2) the sending of the signal causes a "retroactive" split in the multiverse, where the split occurs at the moment the signal is received.

Can any single-universe / realistic interpretation of QM survive if Cramer's "retrocausality" machine worked?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thought John Cramer's interpretation was single universe?
Atleast that's what I got from his email
 
It is, and I don't see how that can be reconciled with true BIT communication. Does the wavefunction of the entire universe change when a message is sent back in time to reflect the consequences of that message? The whole idea makes way too many classical assumptions. MWi would accommodate BIT perfectly fine, though, because the universe would split at the "time" the message is received, and the sender's universe would be unaffected.
 
I am slowly going through the book 'What Is a Quantum Field Theory?' by Michel Talagrand. I came across the following quote: One does not" prove” the basic principles of Quantum Mechanics. The ultimate test for a model is the agreement of its predictions with experiments. Although it may seem trite, it does fit in with my modelling view of QM. The more I think about it, the more I believe it could be saying something quite profound. For example, precisely what is the justification of...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 225 ·
8
Replies
225
Views
15K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 63 ·
3
Replies
63
Views
9K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K