What Initiates Particle Motion in the Universe?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter DrAupo1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Reaction Reactions
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the question of what initiates particle motion in the universe, exploring the implications of Newton's third law of motion and the nature of action and reaction. Participants engage in a blend of physics and philosophical inquiry regarding the definitions and interpretations of forces, particularly in the context of electromagnetism.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the nature of actions and reactions, suggesting that all actions must be part of a reaction, leading to a philosophical inquiry about the definitions of these terms.
  • Another participant raises the question of whether the discussion is more philosophical than physical, indicating a potential divide in focus.
  • It is noted that the labels "action" and "reaction" are arbitrary, and that experts often refer to forces as "third law pairs" without strict designation.
  • A participant mentions Einstein's concept of a finite speed of causality, emphasizing that actions cannot occur instantaneously across distances, and points out potential violations of Newton's third law in electromagnetism.
  • In response to a request for examples of electromagnetic violations of action/reaction, a participant describes a scenario involving charged particles and the role of the electromagnetic field in conserving momentum.
  • Another participant challenges the idea of assigning an "action" to the initiation of motion, suggesting that gravitational forces could also be responsible without a clear designation of action or reaction.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of action and reaction, with some emphasizing the arbitrary nature of these terms while others focus on the implications of electromagnetic interactions. The discussion remains unresolved, with multiple competing perspectives on the initiation of particle motion.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved assumptions regarding the definitions of action and reaction, as well as the implications of electromagnetic forces on Newton's laws. The discussion also touches on the philosophical aspects of these concepts, which may not have clear resolutions within the context of physics alone.

DrAupo1
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
My grandson asked me this question:
If in fact,as Newton said,all actions are accompanied by an equal and opposite reaction, then there can be no single actions in the universe;all actions must therefor be part of a reaction between two opposite and equal actions,which are in fact also reactions.
Any thoughts on this are welcome.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ok...so, what does that do for us? Is that physics or philosophy?
 
Yes, it is well known that the labels "action" and "reaction" are completely arbitrary and can be equally arbitrarily swapped without any change in the physics. Most experts just identify a pair of forces as a "third law pair" and never even bother to identify one or the other as the "reaction".

If you search you should find many threads where this is discussed already.
 
Just remember that Einstein showed us that there's a finite speed of causality...there's no such thing as instantaneous action at a distance. Push the Sun and it'll take a while for the Earth to notice. Also, if I remember correctly, Newton's action/reaction force pairings are violated in certain cases involving electromagnetism.
 
Please give examples of an electromagnetic violation of action/reaction.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
"Please give examples of an electromagnetic violation of action/reaction."

As for electromagnetism, imagine two charged particles moving at one another. The electric force will be equal but opposite, but the magnetic force won't be in opposite directions. This seemingly violates conservation of momentum (which is pretty much what Newton's third law is all about), but it's salvaged by allowing the electromagnetic field itself to possesses momentum.

Edit: I shouldn't have said moving directly at one another, the magnetic force would be zero in that case. A better example would be two positively charged particles, one moving on the x-axis one moving on the y-axis, both moving toward the origin. The electric force will be equal but opposite, the magnetic forces will be in the positive y and positive x directions.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Closed pending moderation.

Edit: the thread is reopened. Several posts have been edited or deleted to remove off topic content. Discussions about entanglement belong in the Quantum Mechanics forum and discussions about the big bang belong in the Cosmology forum. Neither belong in a thread on Newton's third law.
 
Last edited:
Megaquark said:
"Please give examples of an electromagnetic violation of action/reaction."

As for electromagnetism, imagine two charged particles moving at one another. The electric force will be equal but opposite, but the magnetic force won't be in opposite directions. This seemingly violates conservation of momentum (which is pretty much what Newton's third law is all about), but it's salvaged by allowing the electromagnetic field itself to possesses momentum.

Edit: I shouldn't have said moving directly at one another, the magnetic force would be zero in that case. A better example would be two positively charged particles, one moving on the x-axis one moving on the y-axis, both moving toward the origin. The electric force will be equal but opposite, the magnetic forces will be in the positive y and positive x directions.
Imagine the two particles at rest.What action puts them in motion?
 
DrAupo1 said:
Imagine the two particles at rest.What action puts them in motion?
This is precisely why this terminology is discarded. A gravitational force could put them in motion, but there is no reason to assign one or the other as the "action". Similarly with other forces.
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
931
Replies
9
Views
13K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
5K