What Is 4-Dimensional Curl? Get Your Answer Here!

  • Thread starter Thread starter purplegreen
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Curl
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion clarifies that there is no specific term "4-dimensional curl," but it relates to concepts in exterior algebra and Grassmann algebra, which generalize vector products across dimensions. In four dimensions, the curl is represented by a 6-dimensional bi-vector, described using an anti-symmetric 4x4 matrix with six linearly independent components. The mathematical framework for this is rooted in differential forms, where the curl acts as a differentiation operator on (co)vector fields, particularly in the context of physics and relativity theory.

PREREQUISITES
  • Basic understanding of linear algebra
  • Familiarity with differential forms
  • Knowledge of exterior algebra
  • Concepts of anti-symmetric tensors
NEXT STEPS
  • Study "Differential Forms and Connections" by R.W.R. Darling for advanced mathematical concepts
  • Explore Grassmann algebra for a deeper understanding of multi-dimensional vector products
  • Learn about anti-symmetric tensors and their applications in physics
  • Investigate the role of bi-vectors in higher-dimensional calculus
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and students of advanced calculus or differential geometry seeking to understand the complexities of multi-dimensional vector fields and their applications in theoretical physics.

purplegreen
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I would just like to know what the 4 dimensional curl is?

I believe it is a matrix but I am not completely sure.

Thanks for any help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There is nothing specifically called a "4 dimensional curl" but you might be interested in a google search on "exterior algebra" or "Grassmann algebra". This notation provides the proper mathematical generalization of various types of vector products in any number of dimensions. Beware that the situation becomes more complicated and there are many more types of products as you increase the number of dimensions of the space you're working in.

From these algebraic structures you can also construct various types of derivatives in n-space. You can also construct differential forms which allow various types of integration that generalize the ideas of line and surface integrals from ordinary 3 dimensional vector calculus.

The first chapter of "Differential Forms and Connections" by R.W.R. Darling covers this topic. The text is quite mathematical though and may not be suitable if you don't have some background in basic linear algebra and real analysis and feel comfortable with higher levels of mathematical abstraction. I enjoyed the text but found myself scratching my head quite a bit and it took a lot of work to get through it and feel satisfied.

Perhaps others have recommendations.
 
Last edited:
Also want to point out any generalization of curl to 4 dimensions leads to a 6 dimensional value. But I'll first explain 3 dimensional curl.

Three dimensional curl can be geometrically interpreted as a rate of rotation induced by a vector field. It can be described using a 3 by 3 matrix representing the "induced rotation" in the plane generated by each pair of axis (x, y and z). However, this matrix must be anti-symmetric. A pair of like axis doesn't generate a plane and thus the diagonal elements (x-x, y-y, and z-z) aren't used. Also any rotation in the the x-y plane is just the negative of the same rotation in the y-x plane (same goes for y-z vs z-y and z-x vs x-z). Therefore there are really only three planes needed to completely describe a rotation in 3-space, namely x-y, y-z, and z-x.

It turns out in three dimensions each plane has exactly one normal vector, so each plane rotation can be described as a rotation about a given axis using the right hand rule. However this doesn't hold in 4 dimensions because there is no longer a single normal vector for each plane. Instead there is an entire plane of vectors perpendicular to any given plane. Therefore the common notion of "rotation about an axis" no longer makes any sense. Vector fields in dimensions other than 3 do not have a vector form of curl.

Instead the rotation must be described from an anti-symmetric 4 by 4 matrix, which turns out to have 6 linearly independent elements. In the notation of differential forms the curl of a 4 dimensional vector field is not a vector but a bi-vector. The 6 differential rotation components are 2 dimensional objects (dx^dy, dy^dz, dz^dw, dw^dx, dx^dz, and dy^dw).

So in general, the n-dimensional "curl" will be bi-vector with n(n-1)/2 linearly independent components. It just so happens that when n is 3 we get 3*(3-1)/2 = 3 so there is an isomorphism between the bi-vector form and the vector form. Vector fields in \mathbb{R}^n with n something other than 3 do not have a vector form curl, but all have a bi-vector form curl.
 
Last edited:
In the context of physics (relativity theory), the 4D curl of a 4vector A is a second rank antisymmetric tensor F whose double covariant components (6 of them being independent) in a coordinate basis are

F_{\mu\nu} = \nabla_{\mu}A_{\nu} - \nabla_{\nu}A_{\mu}

Standard stuff.
 
in differential form notation, I believe "curl" is a differentiation operator on (co)vector fields, i.e. it is d applied to a one form,

specifically it is d(pdx + qdy + rdz) = dp^dx + dq^dy + dr^dz

= (∂p/∂x dx + ∂q/∂y dy + ∂r/∂z dz)^dx +...obvious stuff, and since dx^dx = 0, we get

= ∂q/∂y dy^dx + ∂r/∂z dz^dx + similar stuff...this operator can be applied to any degree forms in any dimension in the exact same way. you could call any of them higher dimensional curls. you only have to know dx^dx = dy^dy = dz^dz = dw^dw = 0...

and dx^dy = -dy^dx,...
 
dextercioby said:
In the context of physics (relativity theory), the 4D curl of a 4vector A is a second rank antisymmetric tensor F whose double covariant components (6 of them being independent) in a coordinate basis are

F_{\mu\nu} = \nabla_{\mu}A_{\nu} - \nabla_{\nu}A_{\mu}

Standard stuff.

I'm not familiar with that notation. Is it the same as the anti-symmetric tensor...

\dfrac{\partial A_i}{\partial x_j} - \dfrac{\partial A_j}{\partial x_i}

This is stuff I'm interested in learning at some point but haven't had the time.
 
For General Relativity (no torsion and coordinate basis), yes

\nabla_{\mu}A_{\nu}-\nabla_{\nu}A_{\mu} = \partial_{\mu}A_{\nu} - \partial_{\nu}A_{\mu}

, so it doesn't matter is the curvature is present or not.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K