Help with intuition of divergence, gradient, and curl

joshmccraney

Gold Member
1,613
42
hey pf!

i have a few question about the physical intuition for divergence, gradient, and curl. before asking, i'll define these as i have seen them (an intuitive definition).

[tex] \text{Divergence} \:\: \nabla \cdot \vec{v} \equiv \lim_{V \to 0} \frac{1}{V} \oint_A \hat{n} \cdot \vec{v} da [/tex]

[tex] \text{Curl} \:\: \nabla \times \vec{v} \equiv \lim_{V \to 0} \frac{1}{V} \oint_A \hat{n} \times \vec{v} da [/tex]

[tex] \text{Gradient} \:\: \nabla \vec{v} \equiv \lim_{V \to 0} \frac{1}{V} \oint_A \hat{n} \vec{v} da [/tex]

where ##V## is the volume, ##\vec{v}## is a vector field and the rest (i think) is evident.

as for the divergence, i understand that ##\hat{n} \cdot \vec{v} da## is a volumetric flow rate through a differential surface element. thus the integral is the total volumetric flow rate, and dividing by volume and the limit gives us a nice understanding that divergence is expansion/contraction of a vector field.

my understanding is predicated on the understanding of the dot product, namely ##\hat{n} \cdot \vec{v} da##. however, the curl uses a cross product. i understand a cross product to be a vector orthogonal to two given vectors. thus, ##\hat{n} \times \vec{v} da## seems to be some new vector in a field such that it is tangent to the surface at any point. if we add all these vectors ##\hat{n} \times \vec{v} da## up we should get some kind of body rotation about a point, which i think parallels the general understanding of curl.

however, what on earth do we do about the dyadic product ##\hat{n} \vec{v}## embedded in the definition of gradient? i really don't have a physical interpretation of what is happening here, and thus i really don't physically understand ##\nabla \vec{v}##.

please help!
 

Simon Bridge

Science Advisor
Homework Helper
17,822
1,639
The curl is the degree of "circulation" in the vector field.
The gradient is the "slope".

You should get your intuition from using the definitions and not so much from the definitions themselves.
 

joshmccraney

Gold Member
1,613
42
The gradient is the "slope".
but the gradient of a vector is a tensor. is slope still an appropriate description?

thanks for the response.
 

joshmccraney

Gold Member
1,613
42
The vector points in the direction of maximum increase/decrease of the function. The magnitude of the vector gives the traditional "slope".

http://demonstrations.wolfram.com/VisualizingTheGradientVector/

EDIT: The slope in each direction is given by the component values.
i think you're referring to the gradient of a scalar, ##\nabla f##, which returns a vector. but what i am referring to is the gradient of a vector ##\nabla \vec{f}##, which returns a 2nd rank tensor (a matrix).
 
You're right my mistake, sorry I didn't see the vector symbol there!
 

Simon Bridge

Science Advisor
Homework Helper
17,822
1,639
I thought you were after a conceptual understanding ... you can think of grad as an extension of the concept of "slope".
 

joshmccraney

Gold Member
1,613
42
I thought you were after a conceptual understanding ... you can think of grad as an extension of the concept of "slope".
so if ##\vec{v}## is a velocity field would ##\nabla \vec{v}## be some sort velocity flux? but then what is ##\hat{n} \vec{v}##? is it the same?
 

The Physics Forums Way

We Value Quality
• Topics based on mainstream science
• Proper English grammar and spelling
We Value Civility
• Positive and compassionate attitudes
• Patience while debating
We Value Productivity
• Disciplined to remain on-topic
• Recognition of own weaknesses
• Solo and co-op problem solving
Top