What Is a Basis for the Hyperplane in R^4 Defined by -x+y+2z-w=0?

  • Thread starter Thread starter saifatlast
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Basis Subspace
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The basis for the hyperplane defined by the equation -x + y + 2z - w = 0 in R^4 consists of the vectors v1 = [1, 1, 0, 0], v2 = [2, 0, 1, 0], and v3 = [-1, 0, 0, 1]. This hyperplane is a three-dimensional subspace of R^4, not a plane, and can be confirmed by demonstrating that these vectors are linearly independent and span the subspace F. The normal vector to the hyperplane is n = [-1, 1, 2, -1], and taking the dot product of the basis vectors with this normal vector yields zero, confirming their validity as a basis.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of linear algebra concepts, specifically hyperplanes and subspaces.
  • Familiarity with vector operations, including linear independence and spanning sets.
  • Knowledge of dot product calculations and their geometric interpretations.
  • Basic comprehension of R^n spaces, particularly R^4.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study linear independence and spanning sets in vector spaces.
  • Learn about hyperplanes in higher-dimensional spaces, focusing on R^n.
  • Explore the geometric interpretation of normal vectors in relation to hyperplanes.
  • Practice finding bases for various subspaces in R^n using different equations.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, particularly those studying linear algebra, as well as anyone interested in understanding higher-dimensional geometry and vector spaces.

saifatlast
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Find a basis for [tex]F=\left\{(x,y,z,w): -x+y+2z-w=0\right\}[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution



So this looks like a plane to me, but I find 4-d space confusing, so that might be wrong. It does have the form [tex]\mathbf{x}^T\mathbf{n}=0[/tex], so that's kind of where I'm getting the idea that it's a plane. Assuming it is a plane (and if not, I'd appreciate some help getting moving in the right direction), my approach is to find 3 vectors in the plane. The plane should be spanned by the linear combinations of these vectors.

This gives

[tex] <br /> F: \left\{<br /> \begin{bmatrix}1\\1\\0\\0\end{bmatrix},<br /> \begin{bmatrix}2\\0\\1\\0\end{bmatrix},<br /> \begin{bmatrix}-1\\0\\0\\1\end{bmatrix}<br /> \right\}[/tex]

My questions is, assuming this is correct, how do I prove to myself that it is? I guess if I take the dot product of each of the basis vectors with the normal vector, n, below, I do get 0.

[tex]\mathbf{n}=\begin{bmatrix}-1\\1\\2\\-1\end{bmatrix}[/tex]

I guess what it comes down to is that I feel like I'm on shaky ground here, and I'm not quite sure how to firm things up.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your basis for F is the same one I found, so I would imagine we both used the same technique.

F is not a plane; it is a hyper-plane, a three-dimensional subspace of R4. It is a higher-dimension analog of a plane embedded in R3.

You can convince yourself that the three vectors you found are a basis for F by showing that they are linearly independent, and that they span F. These are actually pretty simple to do, if you have chosen your basis vectors wisely (and you did).

Your idea of dotting the three vectors with the normal to this hyperplane is interesting, and probably reasonable to do. It's a little hard to imagine the normal to a three-D "plane" though.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K