What are Clinical Ventilators and Their Challenges?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around clinical ventilators, their functions, challenges associated with improper use, and alternative methods of ventilation. Participants explore theoretical and practical aspects, including the use of CPAP machines and the implications of various ventilation techniques.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express concern about the potential problems arising from improper use of ventilators, including lung injury from over-inflation and over-pressurization.
  • One participant suggests that home CPAP machines could serve as temporary ventilation aids before intubation, questioning their utility in the current context.
  • Another participant highlights the need for sophisticated monitoring systems in modern ventilators to prevent complications such as gastric insufflation and volutrauma.
  • There is a query about the feasibility of using a snorkel mouthpiece as an alternative to facemasks for ventilation, which may require less manual intervention.
  • Concerns are raised regarding the monitoring and intervention required for ventilated patients, including the effects of sedation and the challenges of patient compliance.
  • One participant proposes a breathing assistance method that lies between intubation and facemask use, emphasizing the importance of patient cognizance during ventilation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the best practices for ventilation or the use of alternative methods, indicating multiple competing views and unresolved questions regarding the efficacy and safety of various approaches.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the lack of consensus on the effectiveness of alternative ventilation methods, the dependence on specific clinical situations, and the unresolved nature of the implications of sedation on patient lucidity.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to healthcare professionals, medical researchers, and individuals involved in clinical care or medical technology development.

Lnewqban
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Messages
4,151
Reaction score
2,365
My apologies if already posted here or somewhere else.

These articles are about what a clinical ventilator is, what problems improper use can cause and what parts are some people creating by 3-D printing:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ventilator

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bag_valve_mask

https://www.fastcompany.com/9047794...ives-by-making-new-respirator-valves-for-free

https://hackaday.com/2020/03/12/ult...-design-and-deploy-an-open-source-ventilator/

:frown:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: atyy and hutchphd
Biology news on Phys.org
Lnewqban said:
what problems improper use can cause
What do you think the main problems might be?
 
I think everyone is thinking about ways that we can slightly forestall this impending human tragedy in the USA . One thought I had was whether some of the home CPAP machines could be used as ventilation aids prior to possible intubation with the associated risks. There must be several million of these extant in the US I note that the typical overpressure are measured in inches of H2O and so are very small indeed. I know that only a few feet of surfacing with a full lung can get a scuba diver into trouble ( embolus or otherwise).
Is there any utility for CPAP in this present potential shortfall? Is there something short term to be done?. I feel woefully ignorant here.
 
berkeman said:
What do you think the main problems might be?
I just started exploring this subject.
The second link shows that accidental excess of pressure can do a lot of damage to the lung tissue, reason for which modern machines must have sophisticate systems of monitoring and control, not only of supply pressure, but humidity, volume, percentage of mixed oxygen, etc.

"Under normal breathing, the lungs inflate under a slight vacuum when the chest wall muscles and diaphragm expand; this "pulls" the lungs open, causing air to enter the lungs to inflate under a gentle vacuum. However, when using a manual resuscitator, as with other methods of positive-pressure ventilation, the lungs are force-inflated with pressurized air or oxygen. This inherently leads to risk of various complications, many of which depend on whether the manual resuscitator is being used with a face mask or ET tube. Complications are related to over-inflating or over-pressurizing the patient, which can cause: (1) air to inflate the stomach (called gastric insufflation); (2) lung injury from over-stretching (called volutrauma); and/or (3) lung injury from over-pressurization (called barotrauma)."

From a conversation with a doctor, I have learned that the virus compromises normal functioning of lungs and heart, leading to opportunistic bacterial infections.
When the patient has difficulty breathing by his/her own muscular action, and/or when the surface of blood-air exchage is severely reduced, an external mask is not enough to induce positive ventilation (mixed with oxygen) and that an ET tube is frequently used.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: berkeman and hutchphd
Here's another ignorant question: do any of the techniques use "snorkle" mouthpiece (with maybe nose clip) instead of facemask?. It would seem to require less manual intervention and supervision.
 
Ventilated patients require lots of intervention and monitoring - why you "see" and hear the audible beep-beep.
 
jim mcnamara said:
Ventilated patients require lots of intervention and monitoring - why you "see" and hear the audible beep-beep.

Also, patients continuously on ventillators must be fed through tubes. They can't drink water so they usually get fluid through an IV.

It isn't clear to me how being on ventillator affects a patients lucidity. I suppose many ventillator patients are not lucid due to disease. However, I think most ventillator patients are also given tranquilizers and pain killers. A half awake patient may attempt to tear the mask and tubes away. In the USA, physically restraining a patient's arms to prevent this is a big bureaucratic deal, so drugs are the first resort.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lnewqban
My thought was trying to use some level of breathing assistance intermediate between intubation (which has a host of issues) and facemask (which requires constant monitoring if not direct manual application for efficacy). Hence the idea of a scuba/snorkel mouthpiece. Does any system use this?

This intervention hopefully could take place before the onset of respiratory collapse so the patient might still be cognizant enough to respond appropriately. I have done a lot of medical R&D but very little clinical so this may be foolishness.

With regard to regs...these are not quite desperate times. A luxury that hopefully we can and will continue.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lnewqban
  • #10
jim mcnamara said:
Ventilated patients require lots of intervention and monitoring - why you "see" and hear the audible beep-beep.
I thought this YouTube video may be useful.

 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lnewqban and BillTre

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
2K