What are the challenges in accurately reporting and interpreting COVID-19 data?

  • COVID
  • Thread starter jim mcnamara
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Covid Data
In summary, the sources used to report deaths and data timestamps vary greatly, causing potential discrepancies and confusion in compiling data for medical reporting. It is important to consider all sources and potential factors when analyzing and interpreting data, and to avoid jumping to conclusions or getting wrapped up in small discrepancies. Additionally, suicide deaths can be difficult to accurately report and may have a longer lag time compared to other causes of death.
  • #1
jim mcnamara
Mentor
4,774
3,835
TL;DR Summary
COVID data comments

SourceDeathsData timestamp
https://www]cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/cases-updates/cases-in-us.html175,651Aug 23 2020 12:15PM EDT
https://www]worldometers.info/coronavirus/#countries180,724August 24, 2020, 16:47 GMT
Johns Hopkins U ARCGIS*176,9018/24/2020, 10:27:56 AM
https://covidtracking.com (Atlantic magazine)168,858Aug 24 at 12:19 pm ET
* Dynamic URL, use Google

This kind of data mishmash is common in medical reporting, because local governments control how, when, and where vital statistics are recorded.

And for the US, some political input on evaluating death certficiates seems possible. In this example, the reporting entities are compiling data from lots of sources and it can get confusing for them and us.
For the US this might be 48 states plus Washington DC. Or not.

Example:
Local government has a holiday, FooBar Day on a Monday, and so they do not report any deaths. Coroners office closed. The next business day, the missed deaths are reported and the data compilers do not necessarily know about holidays. So Tuesday after the Monday looks anomalous.

Point:
You may want to avoid getting 'wrapped around the axle' when you see things like this. AFAIK all of the entities are trying to follow their own protocols. Often you may need to take a look at something else to see if the data is okay.
Example excess deaths:
Normally on the first Monday of July, FooBar County reports an average 20 all cause deaths, with a sigma of 3. But you have 38 deaths all from some catchall category. You might want to assume there are excess deaths: ##38 - ( 20 + \sigma*2) = 12## excess deaths. (yes, 2 ##\sigma## not 3, we used this as a a guideline for a vital statistics project for past epidemics)

There are a lot of other things going on. The above is just a simplification. I use the CDC site
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes berkeman
Biology news on Phys.org
  • #2
This doesn't look too bad to me. If you remove the outlier, the other three have a standard deviation equivalent to 2 days. That seems pretty good. Especially compared to other causes of death: I challenge you to find an official suicide number that's newer than a year old. Maybe two. (I have no idea why the suicide lag is as long as it is)
 
  • Like
Likes jim mcnamara and berkeman
  • #3
Re: suicides. The part of the lag I understand is what some places call an adjudication step. In my county all suicides are handled by the Coroner's office and are treated as a potential criminal act. Sometimes the case gets referred back to the County Police if it looks criminal.

Suicides on local reservations is when the FBI gets involved from the get-go. Tribes do not tolerate autopsies, so it gets really sticky. Our local FBI guys have to let autopsies slide most of the time. Then it becomes a paper trail. If the Native American corpse is found off the Res, it is a local police matter. But generally still no autopsies.

After all this, if the case clears all the hurdles, then a judge has to rule it as an official suicide. Then, at last, it can become an official statistic.

Interesting story: the reservation I lived on had a tradition. 'Sleep with the bears' is a crummy translation.

Very occasionally -- Older folks, usually men, went out at sunset in extreme cold, climbed to the top of a mesa, took off all clothing, and sat down. Forever.
 
  • #4
jim mcnamara said:
Re: suicides. The part of the lag I understand is what some places call an adjudication step.

The AP just published an article that military suicides are up 20%. The military knows, loves, and understands paperwork, so they are apparently able to process this more quickly. Extending this increase to the population at large means an additional 10,000 in the US. This would appear as "Covid excess deaths".
 
  • #5
These two statements from the CDC site disagree with you. non-Covid, yes. Excess deaths get lumped using DC data.

Standard DC used by US Armed Forces:
https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/dvs/death11-03final-acc.pdf

Look at item #37. Specifically notes suicide deaths.

The Armed Forces DC numbers reported to the CDC would inflate excess deaths but would NOT affect Covid-19 fatality reporting. Correct. See why below.

Excess deaths should be larger than the Covid-19 reported deaths on the CDC site. And they are.
So the CDC this to get around the problem:
Comparing these two sets of estimates — excess deaths with and without COVID-19 — can provide insight about how many excess deaths are identified as due to COVID-19 ...

Read more here:
https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covid19/excess_deaths.htm

No misplaced 10K deaths as far as the CDC believes. What those solders actually did die from is always based physicians opinions and sometimes autopsies. So who knows perfectly...

@OmCheeto the current page link directly above has more links to datasets. Don't know if they are useful. FWIW the standard US DC in the top link could potentially be of use.
These vary - a lot - even between counties. And suicide is a mess -- sometimes it takes more than a year to substantiate the claim.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes berkeman
  • #6
jim mcnamara said:
Tribes do not tolerate autopsies, so it gets really sticky
I didn't know that.
 
  • #7
I don't think I am saying anything they aren't saying (other than numbers from the AP. They say "Upward trends in other causes of death (e.g., suicide, drug overdose, heart disease) may contribute to excess deaths in some jurisdictions." and "These deaths could represent misclassified COVID-19 deaths, or potentially could be indirectly related to COVID-19."
 

FAQ: What are the challenges in accurately reporting and interpreting COVID-19 data?

1. What is the purpose of collecting COVID data comments?

The purpose of collecting COVID data comments is to gather feedback and insights from individuals and organizations on their experiences and observations related to the pandemic. This information can help researchers and policymakers better understand the impact of COVID-19 and make informed decisions to mitigate its effects.

2. Who can submit COVID data comments?

Anyone can submit COVID data comments, including individuals, healthcare professionals, and organizations. These comments can be based on personal experiences, observations, or data analysis.

3. How are COVID data comments used?

COVID data comments are used by scientists and researchers to supplement existing data and provide a more comprehensive understanding of the pandemic. They can also be used to identify patterns and trends, inform public health policies, and guide future research.

4. Are COVID data comments reliable?

The reliability of COVID data comments depends on the source and the quality of the information provided. It is important for individuals to provide accurate and truthful comments to ensure the validity of the data. Researchers also use various methods to verify and validate the information before incorporating it into their studies.

5. How can I submit COVID data comments?

There are various ways to submit COVID data comments, including online forms, surveys, and email. Many organizations and research institutions also have specific platforms or channels for collecting COVID data comments. You can also reach out to your local health department or government agency for more information on how to submit your comments.

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
93
Views
16K
Back
Top