What is a graviton and why is it considered a boson?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Suedeos
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravitons
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of gravitons, their nature as potential quantized packets of gravitational radiation, and the challenges associated with their detection. Participants explore the theoretical implications of gravitons in the context of gravitational waves and their classification as bosons.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants describe a graviton as a quantized packet of gravitational radiation, analogous to how a photon represents electromagnetic radiation.
  • There is uncertainty regarding the ability to detect gravitational radiation, with some suggesting that current instruments are insufficient and that future upgrades to LIGO may yield results.
  • One participant expresses skepticism about the practical applications of gravitons, noting that they are unlikely to facilitate "anti-gravity" technologies.
  • A participant questions the classification of gravitons as bosons, suggesting that they should be considered a fundamental particle group similar to quarks and leptons.
  • Some participants clarify the functioning of LIGO, explaining that it detects gravitational waves through shifts in interference patterns rather than through particle collisions.
  • There is a general expression of interest in the topic, with participants sharing their enthusiasm for physics despite varying levels of expertise.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the classification of gravitons and their implications, indicating that multiple competing perspectives remain unresolved. There is also a lack of consensus on the practical aspects of detecting gravitational radiation.

Contextual Notes

Some limitations include the dependence on the current capabilities of detection instruments and the theoretical nature of gravitons, which may not be observable with existing technology.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to individuals curious about theoretical physics, particularly those exploring concepts related to gravitational waves and particle physics.

Suedeos
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
hey all, I'm pretty new to physics. all I know is what I was taught at secondary school, which wasn't much to be honest..

sorry if this is a stupid question or in the wrong place or whatever, feel free to move/delete it if it is..

so what I'm wondering about is gravitons. I know as good as nothing about them, but what I do know makes me interested. VERY interested..

could someone please explain to me what a graviton is, and why scientists can't 'create' one for long enough to observe or study it please?

also, if any moderators/admins read this, could you change my name to Suede please, I accidentally added the 'os' to the end. and 'Suedeos' isn't even gramatically correct. thanks :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A graviton would be a quantized packet of gravitational radiation, much like a photon is a quantized packet of electromagnetic radiation.

I'm not sure why you are interested in gravitions - basically, at the current moment in time, we are looking for gravitational radiation (which I find interesting).

After we find that gravitational radiation exists (assuming that we do - our most sensitive instruments are currently not sensitive enough, though we expect that Ligo will start to achieve some reults when it is upgraded) we can start worrying about whether or not this radiation comes in small packets (quanta) like photons. Because gravitational radiation is so weak, detecting a single quanta of it will likely not be possible in our lifetimes, so the question will most likely be totally theoretical.

Note that "gravitions" will most likely not have any applications for "anti-gravity", if by some chance that is why you were interested in them. The relationship of gravitions to gravity is the relations of photons to electromagnetism. The columb force between two particles is due to their charge, and while we can generate photons by shaking a charge around rapidly enough, we cannot increase or decrease the attractive force between unlike charges by generating photons.

Similarly, the gravitational "force" between two particles is due to their mass(actually, their energy to be more precise) - and while gravitational waves can in theory be generated by violent enough events (such as inspiralling neutron stars), they will not increase or decrease the attractive forces between different masses.
 
pervect said:
After we find that gravitational radiation exists (assuming that we do - our most sensitive instruments are currently not sensitive enough, though we expect that Ligo will start to achieve some reults when it is upgraded) we can start worrying about whether or not this radiation comes in small packets (quanta) like photons.
Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory, LIGO, is two big machines, one in Louisiana, and one in Washington state that work together to try and detect gravitational waves.

Also, an interesting thing you can do to help the project, is sign up for Einstein@Home, it sort of uses your computer (when you're not) to crunch all the numbers they get, to see if they detected any gravitational waves.
 
Last edited:
Suedeos said:
also, if any moderators/admins read this, could you change my name to Suede please, I accidentally added the 'os' to the end. and 'Suedeos' isn't even gramatically correct. thanks :)
You can post a thread in the https://www.physicsforums.com/forumdisplay.php?f=19" yourself (better).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mk said:
Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory, LIGO, is two big machines, one in Louisiana, and one in Washington state that work together to try and detect gravitational waves.

*n00b question*

is that the big machines that fire particles in a huge underground tunnel thing? or am I going mad?
 
Suedeos said:
*n00b question*
is that the big machines that fire particles in a huge underground tunnel thing? or am I going mad?

You're going mad. :)

Notice that the description is a "laser interferometer". Any gravitational waves hitting the Earth would cause a shift in the interference pattern (a naive description of how LIGO works).

The "big machines that fire particles in a huge underground tunnel thing" is a particle accelerator/collider. Not meant for detecting gravitational waves.

Zz.
 
Basically, an interferometer is shaped as an "L". From each end, a laser is shot towards the corner, where the combination of the two beams produces an image called an "interference pattern".

When a gravitational wave reaches the interferometer, it makes one of the legs of the "L" longer than it was, hence distorting the interference pattern. Using the distortion, it is possible to measure how space itself was modified by the wave.

Actually, the wave makes one leg longer and the other shorter, and then the other way around.
 
where do you guys get all this information from?!

I find all this stuff really interesting, even though I'm a total noob at this stuff :D
 
All this stuff they've explained is standard university material, but too hard to cram into kids' heads at school.

Its good to know that non-physics people find it interesting when they are presented with top-end physics and think about it for a while! It makes me proud to be studying physics at uni!
 
  • #10
pervect
A graviton would be a quantized packet of gravitational radiation, much like a photon is a quantized packet of electromagnetic radiation.

I have always considered a graviton to be a fundamental particle in its own group in the same manner as quarks and leptons and not a boson as indicated in the above statement. Can you please explain why the graviton is considered to be a member of the boson group (i.e. not a separate group on its own, such as boson, quark or lepton).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
7K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
7K