What is a joule, when you calculate relativistic energy?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of energy in the context of relativity, specifically focusing on the calculation of energy using the formula E=γmc² and its implications for photons. Participants explore the units of energy, the definitions of joules, petajoules (PJ), and megajoules (MJ), and the treatment of mass in relativistic physics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express uncertainty about whether the result of E=γmc² is in joules and inquire about the meaning of PJ and MJ.
  • It is noted that relativity does not change the units of measurement, and using kilograms, meters, and seconds will yield joules for energy.
  • Participants question how to calculate the energy of a photon, pointing out that gamma (γ) becomes undefined for massless particles traveling at the speed of light.
  • A participant introduces the more general formula E² = p²c² + m²c⁴, explaining that for photons, which have zero rest mass, the formula simplifies to E = pc.
  • Another participant emphasizes the need to use the general formula for massless particles and provides the relationship E = hν for photons.
  • There is a discussion regarding the concept of mass for photons, with some participants stating that photons have zero rest mass but can be associated with "relativistic mass" in terms of energy.
  • One participant argues that momentum can be measured directly through interactions, and mass is not necessary to calculate energy for photons.
  • Another participant raises a question about the mass of photons when they are moving at the speed of light, seeking clarification on how to calculate momentum and energy in that context.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the use of the formula E² = p²c² + m²c⁴ for calculating energy, but there is disagreement regarding the interpretation of mass for photons and the implications of using different formulas. The discussion remains unresolved on certain aspects, particularly the nature of mass and energy for massless particles.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the ambiguity in the definitions of PJ and MJ without context, and the unresolved nature of how to interpret mass for photons in relation to their energy and momentum.

Dgonzo15
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Energy is E=γmc^2, but when I calculate this, will my result be in joules? I am unsure what the units are when I calculate it, and I keep hearing people saying joules.
Also, what is PJ and MJ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Dgonzo15 said:
Energy is E=γmc^2, but when I calculate this, will my result be in joules? I am unsure what the units are when I calculate it, and I keep hearing people saying joules.
Also, what is PJ and MJ?

Relativity doesn't change the units of anything. If you use kg, meters, seconds you get joules for energy. Most commonly, I would guess PJ is petajoule and MJ megajoule, but these are ambiguous out of context: MJ could be millijoule or microjoule; PJ could be picojoule or the founder of groklaw.
 
So how would I calculate the energy of a photon? Since a photon travels at c, gamma (in E=γmc^2) would be undefined, so it doesn't make any sense to calculate the energy of a photon.
Also, are photons considered to have mass, because mass is also a factor in E=γmc^2.
 
Dgonzo15 said:
So how would I calculate the energy of a photon? Since a photon travels at c, gamma (in E=γmc^2) would be undefined, so it doesn't make any sense to calculate the energy of a photon.

Not if you use an incorrect formula for a photon, no. :wink:

The correct formula, valid for any object, timelike (nonzero rest mass, moves slower than light) or lightlike (zero rest mass, moves at speed of light) is:

E^2 = p^2 c^2 + m^2 c^4

where ##E## is the energy, ##p## is the momentum, and ##m## is the rest mass. A photon has ##m = 0##, so the formula reduces to ##E = pc##.
 
Dgonzo15 said:
So how would I calculate the energy of a photon? Since a photon travels at c, gamma (in E=γmc^2) would be undefined, so it doesn't make any sense to calculate the energy of a photon.
Also, are photons considered to have mass, because mass is also a factor in E=γmc^2.

You need to use the more general formula: E^2 = (mc^2)^2 + p^2 c^2 [p is momentum]

For massless particles you get E=pc. For a photon, E = h\nu, p=E/c.

Note, if you plug in p = \gammamv, you will get the special formula for massive particles.
 
Dgonzo15 said:
Also, are photons considered to have mass, because mass is also a factor in E=γmc^2.

Photons have zero rest mass. Some people use the term "relativistic mass", but that's really just another term for "energy"; a photon certainly has energy, so it does have relativistic mass, but as in my previous post, you can't define its relativistic mass/energy using ##\gamma##, so you have to use the more general formula I posted.
 
OK, so the formula E^2=P^2... reduces to E=pc for photons since photons have zero REST mass. Since they have zero REST mass, what is their mass when they are moving at c? You would need to know their mass in order to calculate p so you can calculate E when they are moving, right?
 
Dgonzo15 said:
OK, so the formula E^2=P^2... reduces to E=pc for photons since photons have zero REST mass. Since they have zero REST mass, what is their mass when they are moving at c? You would need to know their mass in order to calculate p so you can calculate E when they are moving, right?

No, you directly measure momentum via interaction (using conservation of momentum). There is not mass distinguishable from energy (which is also directly measurable). For light, relevant formulas use only E and p not mass.

Note, this does not imply photons are not affected by gravity. In GR energy is a source of gravity and is affected by gravity.

Really, what distinguishes mass from energy is the existence of a frame where p=0, and KE=0. Without that, there is no meaningful way to distinguish mass from energy.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 102 ·
4
Replies
102
Views
7K
  • · Replies 55 ·
2
Replies
55
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 87 ·
3
Replies
87
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
854
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K