What is Ann's final position in different reference frames?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem in relativity involving two individuals, Ann and Betty, who are situated in different reference frames. The problem asks for Ann's final position in both her own frame and Betty's frame after following specific movement instructions. The context suggests an exploration of how relative motion affects position in different frames of reference.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the implications of Ann's movements and the concept of reference frames. Questions arise about the necessity of knowing relative velocities to solve the problem. Some participants suggest that Ann's position in her own frame might be straightforward, while others express uncertainty about the wording of the question and its implications.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants sharing their interpretations and questioning the assumptions made in the problem. Some guidance has been offered regarding the use of Galilean transformations, but there is no consensus on how to proceed without additional information about relative velocities.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted lack of details regarding the relative velocities of Ann and Betty, which participants highlight as a significant factor in addressing the problem. The wording of the question is also under scrutiny, with some participants expressing confusion about its implications.

Sanjay87
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I'm quite new to relativity and I'm just going through some problems from past exam papers to prepare for an upcoming subject. The following question has me a little stumped:

Betty is at the origin of her frame of reference. At a certain point in time, this also corresponds to the origin of Ann's reference frame. Betty gives Ann the following instructions: walk 1km East, 2km North and 3km East. (there is an x-y graph pictured, indicating that 1km East corresponds to local co-ordinates (1,0) and 1km North corresponds to local co-ordinates (0,1)). The questions are - What is Ann's final position in her own frame? What is Ann's final position in Betty's frame?

Presumably, Ann and Betty are in different reference frames S and S' respectively, with S' moving at constant speed v relative to S.

I hope somebody can help me.

Kind Regards,
George
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sanjay87 said:
Betty gives Ann the following instructions: walk 1km East, 2km North and 3km East. (there is an x-y graph pictured, indicating that 1km East corresponds to local co-ordinates (1,0) and 1km North corresponds to local co-ordinates (0,1)). The questions are - What is Ann's final position in her own frame? What is Ann's final position in Betty's frame?

I suspect that Ann's position within her own frame is trivial (since she is the origin of her own frame), but you should note that directions of "East" and "North" generally refer to angular directions on a (presumably) spherical surface.

Regards,

Bill
 
Presumably, Ann and Betty are in different reference frames S and S' respectively, with S' moving at constant speed v relative to S.
Why 'presumably' ? If you don't have details of their relative velocities, how can the problem be solved ?
 
Mentz114 said:
Why 'presumably' ? If you don't have details of their relative velocities, how can the problem be solved ?

heh-heh..

What if Betty told Ann how fast to walk?:smile:

I think the relations regarding N/E and x,y imply that Betty and Ann have the same velocity with respect to something infinitely far away.

Then again, if Betty told Ann to change her altitude, there would be a problem...

Regards,

Bill
 
Mentz114 said:
Why 'presumably' ? If you don't have details of their relative velocities, how can the problem be solved ?

This is why the question has stumped me. The way the question is worded, Betty and Ann are in different reference frames which must be moving at some velocity relative to each other, and perhaps they expect the answer to be in the form of variables - e.g. x' = 2+vt. Or have I misunderstood the question (I suspect that I have misunderstood it).
 
Hi again,

Using the Galilean transformations, I would say that in Betty's frame, Ann is at position (-2+vt, 2). But it worries me that no velocity has been given. The response from Antenna Guy makes sense so in that case both parties would agree that Ann is at (-2,2). What do you think?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
7K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
8K