What is Buoyancy? - Learn about Newton's 3rd Law & Vacuum Filling

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter sameeralord
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Buoyancy
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the concept of buoyancy, exploring its relationship with Newton's third law, pressure gradients, and the behavior of fluids. Participants examine various understandings of buoyancy, including its mechanisms and implications in different contexts, such as hydrostatics and the behavior of gases.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether buoyancy is a result of Newton's third law or the filling of a vacuum, presenting multiple interpretations of buoyancy.
  • Another participant explains that an object with greater density than the fluid will sink, while one with lesser density will float.
  • A participant uses mercury and ice cubes as examples to illustrate how density affects buoyancy, emphasizing the pressure gradient in fluids.
  • There is a discussion about whether the water molecules in a bottle are moving and how this relates to hydrostatics and buoyancy forces.
  • One participant raises a question about why hot air rises, linking it to buoyancy and density differences in the atmosphere.
  • Another participant describes how molecular collisions in a fluid create a net upward force on submerged objects, contributing to the understanding of buoyancy.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various interpretations and understandings of buoyancy, with no clear consensus on the relationship between buoyancy and Newton's laws or the mechanisms involved. Multiple competing views remain, particularly regarding the role of pressure gradients and molecular behavior in fluids.

Contextual Notes

Some participants reference hydrostatics and pressure gradients, but there are limitations in the understanding of how these concepts apply to buoyancy. The discussion includes unresolved questions about the movement of fluid molecules and the implications of density differences.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for individuals interested in fluid mechanics, physics students exploring buoyancy concepts, or anyone seeking to understand the principles of hydrostatics and gas behavior.

sameeralord
Messages
659
Reaction score
3
Hello everyone,

I'm bit confused about buoyancy. First of all I want to know if it is Newton's third law, filling a vacuum or none of above. For example these are my 3 diffferent understandings of what buoyancy could be. Which one is right

I fall on water and diplace water molecules, do the water molecules give a reaction force back on me calling buoyancy. If that is the case why is it not Newton's third law.

when I displace water molecules, water molecules from underneath come to fill the vacuum and push me up(especially when you displace air isn't this what happens). Is this buoyacny?

Thanks :smile:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When an "object" has a greater density than the fluid it will sink until that density is equal to the fluid at that level.
Does that help?

Conversely, an object will float or rise if its density is less than the fluid surrounding it.
 
It's best to think of it like this. If you pour mercury into water, the mercury flows to the bottom of the container because it's denser than water. Same thing for a lead brick.

Now if you pour water onto mercury it stays on top. Same for an ice cube. It's not dense enough to push the mercury aside and sink. Pit differently gravity pulls on the mercury harder than on an ice cube so the ice cube stays on top. And if you push the ice cube to the bottom of the mercury bucket and let it go, the cube will float back up to the top because the heavier mercury is pulled down and under the ice cube with greater force by gravity.

That's the heuristic explanation. The correct way to describe it is that in a fluid there's a pressure gradient from the bottom to the top. You feel this gradient in tour chest if you dive into a swimming pool. So the pressure under a submerged object is higher than the pressure above it. If the submerged object weighs less than this pressure difference, the object is pushed up. If the object is greater than this difference it will sink.
 
Antiphon said:
It's best to think of it like this. If you pour mercury into water, the mercury flows to the bottom of the container because it's denser than water. Same thing for a lead brick.

Now if you pour water onto mercury it stays on top. Same for an ice cube. It's not dense enough to push the mercury aside and sink. Pit differently gravity pulls on the mercury harder than on an ice cube so the ice cube stays on top. And if you push the ice cube to the bottom of the mercury bucket and let it go, the cube will float back up to the top because the heavier mercury is pulled down and under the ice cube with greater force by gravity.

That's the heuristic explanation. The correct way to describe it is that in a fluid there's a pressure gradient from the bottom to the top. You feel this gradient in tour chest if you dive into a swimming pool. So the pressure under a submerged object is higher than the pressure above it. If the submerged object weighs less than this pressure difference, the object is pushed up. If the object is greater than this difference it will sink.

Thanks antiphon :smile: Ok so if I get a water bottle, are the molecules at the bottom traveling towards the top because of the pressure difference? So then if I submerge an object with large volume, it will displace water to a greater depth, hence it has to overcome a higher pressure difference to sink. Is that what happens.
 
In your water bottle the water isn't moving. This is the study of hydrostatics. There is a steady pressure gradient but nothing moves because the pressures all balence the weights.

Check out the hydrostatics page in Wikipedia.
 
Antiphon said:
In your water bottle the water isn't moving. This is the study of hydrostatics. There is a steady pressure gradient but nothing moves because the pressures all balence the weights.

Check out the hydrostatics page in Wikipedia.

Then if nothing moves up, how is the buoyancy force created upwards? I looked at the hydrostatic page but unfortuanetly I don't understand much about it. Can you tell me why nothing moves, because normally pressure gradient creates movement. Thanks :smile:

EDIT: In buyoncy are the displaced molecules following the pressure gradient to create the upward force. So when the molecules are dispersed are they coming back to push the object.
 
Why does hot air rise?

Hello everyone,

I know the pressure at bottom of atmosphere is higher than above. Then when I suddenly heat up air at the bottom of atmosphere why does it rise? Ok if it is buoyancy, why doesn't the air at the top fall down towards earth, because they are less dense so they must fall right? I can understand how a small leaf can float in air but how can the medium itself float up? Thanks :smile:
 
For example water consists of molecules which all whizz around and collide with the object submerged in the water. These collisions give the object a push, but since they come from all directions, the object doesn't move on average.
Well... not quite. As you know the density of molecules increases with water depth. So more molecules are colliding against the object from below than from above. The net effect is an acceleration upwards, which is just the buoyant force.
 
Gerenuk said:
For example water consists of molecules which all whizz around and collide with the object submerged in the water. These collisions give the object a push, but since they come from all directions, the object doesn't move on average.
Well... not quite. As you know the density of molecules increases with water depth. So more molecules are colliding against the object from below than from above. The net effect is an acceleration upwards, which is just the buoyant force.

Your explanation actually made me get it. Thanks :smile:
 
  • #10
Glad I could help :)
I only learned that after my physics course, when I saw the derivation with an integral which just calculates this force difference and shows that for a pressure gradient proportional to the depth, the net force is just the amount of water excluded.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
8K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K