What is "% fs" Meaning in AFM Oscillation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter stephenx_86
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The term "% fs" in the context of AFM oscillation refers to "percent full scale," indicating the magnitude of the cantilever's displacement relative to its maximum output. This measurement is displayed by the software "ACQUIRE" during frequency sweeps to analyze how the resonant frequency varies with environmental conditions. There is uncertainty regarding whether "fs" corresponds to the resonant frequency output by the machine or another value. The user notes that the frequency response data is noisy and lacks a clear peak, complicating the interpretation of the results. Understanding the calculation of resonant frequency by the software is crucial for accurate analysis.
stephenx_86
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Meaning of "% fs"

Hi,

We're using a lock-in amplifier to oscillate an AFM-style cantilever (across a frequency sweep) and measure the response using a QPD. The aim of this is to see how the resonant frequency changes with changing environmental conditions.

The software we use ("ACQUIRE" by "Signal Recovery") is displaying this frequency response in terms of "Mag. (% fs)", which I assume is some sort of magnitude - maybe the magnitude of cantilever displacement? What we're least sure of is what exactly "% fs" means in this context. From looking round the internet it seems Fs is resonant frequency, but I don't know if this is the same Fs as the fs output by our machine! In the manual this is written as "MAG% (10V fs)", which might shed some more light on the situation.

If this actually is a percentage of the resonant frequency, does anyone know how resonant frequency is being calculated by the software? The spectra we get out (Mag (% fs) as a function of driving frequency (Hz)) is pretty noisy with no single, clear peak and goes up to ~300 (% fs).

If anyone could shed some light on what "% fs" is, we'd be really grateful.

Thanks
Stephen
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Percent full scale.
 
I do not have a good working knowledge of physics yet. I tried to piece this together but after researching this, I couldn’t figure out the correct laws of physics to combine to develop a formula to answer this question. Ex. 1 - A moving object impacts a static object at a constant velocity. Ex. 2 - A moving object impacts a static object at the same velocity but is accelerating at the moment of impact. Assuming the mass of the objects is the same and the velocity at the moment of impact...

Similar threads

Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
721
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
9K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
3K