Forced Damped Oscillator frequency independent quantaties

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the analysis of frequency-independent quantities in a forced damped oscillator, specifically the displacement amplitude at low frequencies, the velocity amplitude at velocity resonance, and the acceleration amplitude at very high frequencies. The relevant equations include the amplitude formula A(ω) = F₀/m / √((ω₀² - ω²)² + (ω₀/Q ω)²) and the definitions of Q and ω₀. The approach involves expanding the equations around specific points of interest to demonstrate the frequency independence of these quantities.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of forced damped oscillators
  • Familiarity with amplitude equations and resonance concepts
  • Knowledge of derivatives and their application in physics
  • Basic grasp of frequency response and quality factor (Q)
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the amplitude formula A(ω) for forced damped oscillators
  • Learn about Taylor series expansions and their applications in physics
  • Explore the concept of resonance in oscillatory systems
  • Investigate the implications of frequency independence in mechanical systems
USEFUL FOR

Students studying mechanical vibrations, physicists analyzing oscillatory systems, and educators teaching concepts related to forced damped oscillators.

mbigras
Messages
61
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


For the forced damped oscillator, show that the following are frequency independent.
a) displacement amplitude at low frequencies.
b) the velocity amplitude at velocity resonance.
c) the acceleration amplitude at very high frequencies



Homework Equations


[tex] A(\omega) = <br /> \frac<br /> {F_{0}}<br /> {m}<br /> \frac<br /> {1}<br /> {\left(\left(\omega_{0}^{2}-\omega^{2}\right)^{2}+\left(\frac{\omega_{0}}{Q} \omega\right)^{2}\right)^{1/2}}<br /> \\<br /> x = A \cos(\omega t + \alpha)\\<br /> \\<br /> Q = \omega_{0}/\gamma\\<br /> \omega_{0} = \sqrt{\frac{k}{m}}[/tex]



The Attempt at a Solution


To find the velocity and acceleration we can take the derivative and second derivatve of [itex]x[/itex]. The amplitudes are then (for displacement, velocity and acceleration):
[tex] A(\omega)\\<br /> -\omega A(\omega)\\<br /> -\omega^{2} A(\omega)[/tex]
Then the question asks me to show that the equations are frequency indepedent. What I'm most curious about is how to approach these questions. Every time I get one of these questions I experience a deer in the head lights effect. My general guess is that the structure of the question is:

Given an equation, a statement that you can use to make an approximation and a statement that you can use to find a point of interest:
Expand the equation about the point of interest, make an approximation and you'll see that the equation actually behaves in some useful way, or at least a way that makes a calculation easier.

Is this on the right track?

So part a, would I expand about 0, and use the approximation that [itex]\omega << \omega_{0}[/itex]? For part b, would I expand about [itex]\omega_{0}?[/itex]

What does it mean to be frequency independent? Does that mean the frequency term will drop out?

This question has me confused, obviously, but what I think is more important is that it's the whole process that confuses me. I'd like some tips for how to approach these types of questions. Specifically, when to expand, what type of expansions to use, how to choose where your expanding about, and how to understand what your looking for.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have the right idea in computig A, wA and w^2 A for displacement, velocity and acceleration respectively. But then you over-complicate the problem.

a) What is A(w) if w goes to zero? Use your formula you derived.
b) wht is wA when w approaches w0?
c) what is w^2 A when w approaches infinity?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
988
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
39
Views
5K