What is happening when travelling towards light?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter RogiNicba
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Light
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the nature of light speed as perceived by observers moving towards or away from a light source, particularly in the context of special relativity. Participants explore the implications of time dilation and length contraction on the measurement of light speed in various scenarios, questioning how these effects reconcile with the postulate that the speed of light is constant for all observers.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that while moving towards a beam of light, the effects of time dilation and length contraction should lead to a perception of light speed that differs from c, but this does not occur.
  • Another participant states that regardless of motion towards or away from a light source, the speed of light remains c, providing mathematical formulations to support this claim.
  • A participant expresses difficulty in visualizing how the speed of light remains constant when traveling towards a light source, questioning the implications of time dilation and length contraction on perceived speeds of light beams moving in different directions.
  • Some participants discuss the foundational assumptions of special relativity, noting that the constancy of light speed is a postulate rather than a derived consequence.
  • One participant seeks clarification on how both beams of light can be perceived at speed c simultaneously, raising concerns about the implications of time and length changes in this context.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying degrees of understanding and confusion regarding the implications of special relativity, particularly in visualizing the effects of motion on light speed. There is no consensus on the interpretation of these effects, and multiple competing views remain regarding the reconciliation of perceived speeds of light with relativistic effects.

Contextual Notes

Some participants highlight limitations in their understanding of the mathematical formulations and the conceptual underpinnings of special relativity, indicating a need for further clarification on how relativistic effects operate in different scenarios.

RogiNicba
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
When a vehicle is moving while projecting light forward, time slows down inside and the length of the vehicle contracts just enough so that the combination of this two effects make the people inside the vehicle percieve the speed of light projected still be approximetly c no matter the speed of the vehicle, right?

But I was wondering; what makes the people traveling towards a beam of light measure its speed to still be c? I suppose the vehicle in this case should lengthen and the time should be running faster for the passengers to compensate, but that doesn't happen.

Thanks in advance!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
It doesn't matter at all whether you are moving toward or away from a light source. In either case, the speed of light (as opposed to "velocity") is c.
If you are moving toward a light source at speed v (velocity -v) relative to the source and light is moving away from the source at speed c, then the speed of light, relative to you, is
[tex]\frac{-v+ c}{1- vc/c^2}= c\frac{-vc+c^2}{c^2- vc}= c\frac{c^2-vc}{c^2- vc}= c[/tex]
If you are moving away from a light source at speed v( velocity v) relative to the source and light is moving away from the source at speed c, then the speed of light, relative to you, is
[tex]\frac{v+c}{1+ vc/c^2}= c\frac{vc+ c^2}{c^2+ vc}= c\frac{c^2+ vc}{c^2+ vc}= c[/tex].
 
I realize that according to special relativity light travels at c for all observers regardless of their speed and direction. The problem is that I can visualise why that is true in the case when something is traveling in the same direction as the light. But I can't understand/visualise how that (the constant speed of light) can also be true when you are traveling towards the source of the light...

To explain what I mean further; suppose you're traveling at a half the speed of light and there are 2 separate beams of light traveling infront of you, one on the path towards you while the other is traveling away from you(in the sam direction your headed). Now becouse of a combined effect of time dilation and length contraction if one were to measure the speed of the light beam on the path away from you, you would measure(dispite the fact that you're moving at half the speed of light) that the beam is acctualy traveling at c. Becouse even tho Galilean invariance tells us that now the light that is heading away from us shlould be moving away from our vehicle at a distance of c/2 that is not true becouse time dilation takes care that we percieve the beam going a bit faster and length contraction makes sure that our "shortened rullers" measure the length the beam travels to be just enough longer that from the point of view of the driver of the vehicle the light is still traveling at c. Do I understand this correctly so far?

But what troubles me is; wouldn't you now percieve the speed of that other beam(the one headed towards you) to be 1.5c becouse of time moving slower for you and your perception of length being diffrent? How can we percieve both beams of light going at the same speeds at the same time? Didn't Einstein say something along the lines:"If the speed of light is constant for all observers than something else has to change", and so he figured time and length change so that from the observers point of view the speed of light stays the same. But wouldn't than be true that if we wanted to percieve the speed of the beam headed towards us to be c, we should lengthen and time should then be going faster for us? But both time contration and time dilation+length dilation and length contraction is not possible at the same time right?

I appologise for the long post. I just want to make my point clear so you can help me understand. I should also mention that I have been reading/studying up on Special and General relativity for only about 2weeks now and I'm only a high school graduate 19years of age so I'm not saying Einstein was wrong or anything I'm just clearly missunderstanding/not getting something. But I'm very interested in this and would appreciate it very much if someone could make me understand this. Prefferably in a manner that someone of my education would understand if possible :)

Thanks!
 
Last edited:
RogiNicba said:
I realize that according to special relativity light travels at c for all observers regardless of their speed and direction. The problem is that I can visualise why that is true...
SR doesn't tell you why that is true. It is not a consequence of SR, but an assumption on which SR is based.
RogiNicba said:
But what troubles me is; wouldn't you now percieve the speed of that other beam(the one headed towards you) to be 1.5c becouse of time moving slower for you and your perception of length being diffrent?
Different from what? Knowing how exactly you calculated the 1.5c would be more useful than the long explanation.
 
RogiNicba said:
I realize that according to special relativity light travels at c for all observers regardless of their speed and direction. The problem is that I can visualise why that is true in the case when something is traveling in the same direction as the light. But I can't understand/visualise how that (the constant speed of light) can also be true when you are traveling towards the source of the light...

To explain what I mean further; suppose you're traveling at a half the speed of light and there are 2 separate beams of light traveling infront of you, one on the path towards you while the other is traveling away from you(in the sam direction your headed). Now becouse of a combined effect of time dilation and length contraction if one were to measure the speed of the light beam on the path away from you, you would measure(dispite the fact that you're moving at half the speed of light) that the beam is acctualy traveling at c. Becouse even tho Galilean invariance tells us that now the light that is heading away from us shlould be moving away from our vehicle at a distance of c/2 that is not true becouse time dilation takes care that we percieve the beam going a bit faster and length contraction makes sure that our "shortened rullers" measure the length the beam travels to be just enough longer that from the point of view of the driver of the vehicle the light is still traveling at c. Do I understand this correctly so far?

But what troubles me is; wouldn't you now percieve the speed of that other beam(the one headed towards you) to be 1.5c becouse of time moving slower for you and your perception of length being diffrent? How can we percieve both beams of light going at the same speeds at the same time? Didn't Einstein say something along the lines:"If the speed of light is constant for all observers than something else has to change", and so he figured time and length change so that from the observers point of view the speed of light stays the same. But wouldn't than be true that if we wanted to percieve the speed of the beam headed towards us to be c, we should lengthen and time should then be going faster for us? But both time contration and time dilation+length dilation and length contraction is not possible at the same time right?

I appologise for the long post. I just want to make my point clear so you can help me understand. I should also mention that I have been reading/studying up on Special and General relativity for only about 2weeks now and I'm only a high school graduate 19years of age so I'm not saying Einstein was wrong or anything I'm just clearly missunderstanding/not getting something. But I'm very interested in this and would appreciate it very much if someone could make me understand this. Prefferably in a manner that someone of my education would understand if possible :)

Thanks!

Part of the problem is that you are putting the cart in front of the horse, so to say.
SR starts with the premise that the speed of light is the same for all observers and because of this, you will measure a clock moving relative to you as ticking slower and being foreshortened, not that they will measure light at c because they are shorter and their clock is running slow. (someone traveling with that clock would say the same about you.)

The other thing is that there is a third effect of Relativity called the Relativity of Simultaneity. What it means is that if you have two clocks separated by a distance and moving parallel to the line joining them, they can read the same time according to someone at rest with respect to them, but will read different times according to someone for which they are moving. According to them the front clock will be ahead of the rear clock. Conversely, if the clocks read the same time to someone for which they are moving, they will not read the same time according to someone at rest with respect to the clocks.

This difference in readings between the clocks according observers is what makes up for what time dilation and length contraction can't alone.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
894
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K