What is maximum Pauling electronegativity or energy difference between orbitals?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on Pauling electronegativity and the energy difference between atomic orbitals in the context of molecular orbital theory. It highlights the semi-empirical formula for dissociation energies, specifically $$E_{\mathrm{d}}(\mathrm{AB})=\frac{E_{\mathrm{d}}(\mathrm{AA})+E_{\mathrm{d}}(\mathrm{BB})}{2}+\left(\chi_{\mathrm{A}}-\chi_{\mathrm{B}}\right)^2 \mathrm{eV}$$, which indicates that stronger bonds occur with a higher atomic orbital energy difference $$(\chi_A-\chi_B)$$. The discussion critiques the ambiguity of the term "similar" in energy levels and suggests that the concept of ionic or molecular bonds is an oversimplification, advocating for a quantum mechanics approach for a more accurate understanding.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Pauling electronegativity
  • Familiarity with molecular orbital theory
  • Knowledge of dissociation energy calculations
  • Basic principles of quantum mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of the semi-empirical formula for dissociation energies in chemical bonding
  • Explore the relationship between atomic radius and electronegativity
  • Investigate quantum mechanics applications in molecular bonding
  • Learn about the limitations of classical theories in explaining ionic and molecular bonds
USEFUL FOR

Chemists, physicists, and students of quantum mechanics seeking a deeper understanding of atomic interactions and bonding theories.

adf89812
Messages
37
Reaction score
1
TL;DR
AO energy difference maximum such that bonding orbital is still possible is what?
>-Atomic orbitals must be at the similar energy levels to combine as molecular orbitals, said Wikipedia.


This is unclear. How do you quantify how "similar" means?

I heard electronegative is tied to atomic radius is tied to atomic orbital energy.


What are two atoms that would in theory form an ionic compound if you use a naive theory but actually don't because the atomic orbitals are too dissimilar in energy levels according to molecular orbital theory?

>The essential point of Pauling electronegativity is that there is an underlying, quite accurate, semi-empirical formula for dissociation energies, namely:
>$$
E_{\mathrm{d}}(\mathrm{AB})=\frac{E_{\mathrm{d}}(\mathrm{AA})+E_{\mathrm{d}}(\mathrm{BB})}{2}+\left(\chi_{\mathrm{A}}-\chi_{\mathrm{B}}\right)^2 \mathrm{eV}
$$

According to this equation, you have a stronger bond when the atomic orbital energy difference $$(\chi_A-\chi_B)$$ is high. Does this equation contradict the first quote?
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
There is no strict definition of what "similar" means, these are just rules of thumb, so they use lots of handwaving.
adf89812 said:
>$$
E_{\mathrm{d}}(\mathrm{AB})=\frac{E_{\mathrm{d}}(\mathrm{AA})+E_{\mathrm{d}}(\mathrm{BB})}{2}+\left(\chi_{\mathrm{A}}-\chi_{\mathrm{B}}\right)^2 \mathrm{eV}
$$

According to this equation, you have a stronger bond when the atomic orbital energy difference $$(\chi_A-\chi_B)$$ is high. Does this equation contradict the first quote?

Only if you ignore first part of the formula. You can have very strong bond even if $$(\chi_A-\chi_B)$$ is zero.
 
Borek said:
There is no strict definition of what "similar" means, these are just rules of thumb, so they use lots of handwaving.


Only if you ignore first part of the formula. You can have very strong bond even if $$(\chi_A-\chi_B)$$ is zero.
what's the non-handwaving answer they're avoiding?
 
That there is no such thing like ionic/molecular bond and that the full and exact answer is just a direct application of quantum mechanics (and as such far from being easily applicable).
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
15K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
10K
  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K