What is meant by small oscillations for this potential energy function?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the concept of small oscillations around stable equilibrium points in a potential energy function. It establishes that the force on a particle is derived from the potential energy function, leading to three equilibrium points, including one at x=0. The Taylor approximation of the force near these points reveals that the linear term resembles Hooke's law, indicating harmonic motion for small oscillations. The condition for small oscillations requires that higher-order terms in the Taylor expansion remain negligible compared to the linear term. The analysis concludes that while x=0 is a local maximum of the potential, it serves as a semi-stable equilibrium, with the other two points exhibiting different stability characteristics.
zenterix
Messages
774
Reaction score
84
Homework Statement
A particle of mass ##m## moves on the ##x##-axis with potential energy

$$V(x)=\frac{E_0}{a^4}x^4+4ax^3-8a^2x^2$$
Relevant Equations
a) Find the positions at which the particle is in stable equilibrium.

b) Find the angular frequency of small oscillations about each stable equilibrium position.

c) What do you mean by small oscillations? Be quantitative and give a separate answer for each point of stable equilibrium.
The force on the particle is

$$F(x)=-V'(x)$$

By equating this to zero we find points of stable equilibrium. There are three such points

$$x=0$$

$$x=a^3\left ( \frac{-3a^2\pm\sqrt{9a^4+16E_0}}{2E_0} \right )$$

Next we use a Taylor approximation to ##F##.

$$F(x+\Delta x) \approx F(x)+F'(x)\Delta x+\frac{F''(x)}{2}(\Delta x)^2$$

$$=-V'(x)-V''(x)\Delta x-\frac{V'''(x)}{2}(\Delta x)^2$$

We can then evaluate this Taylor approximations near each of the three points of equilibrium.

Near ##x=0## we get

$$F(\Delta x)\approx 16a^2\Delta x-24a(\Delta x)^2$$

Near the other two points of equilibrium we get

$$F(x_0+\Delta x)\approx -\frac{18a^6\pm6a^4\sqrt{9a^4+16E_0}+32E_0a^2}{E_0}\Delta x-\frac{-12a^2\pm 12\sqrt{9a^4+16E_0}}{a}(\Delta x)^2$$

For each of these three cases, if we only consider the linear term in the Taylor approximation, then the functional form of ##F## in the approximation is that of Hooke's law.

In the first case, with ##k=0## and in the other two cases with ##k=\frac{18a^6\pm6a^4\sqrt{9a^4+16E_0}+32E_0a^2}{E_0}##.

The angular frequencies of oscillation near each of these equilibrium points are then given by ##\omega=\sqrt{\frac{k}{m}}##.

This approximation is, apparently, only good for small oscillations. My question is about item (c) in the original problem: what do we mean by small oscillations?

It seems that we need the quadratic term in the Taylor approximation and all subsequent terms to be small compared to the first order term.

In the book I am reading, Georgi's "The Physics of Waves", it seems we must have

1720281440455.png


However, I don't quite totally understand the condition 1.25 above (and have asked about it before).

How do we apply this condition in the current problem. For example, for the equilibrium point ##x=0## we have ##V'''(0)=24a## and so ##|xV'''(0)|=|24xa|##. We also have ##V''(0)=-16a^2##.

Thus it seems that for ##x## near 0, ##|xV'''(0|## approaches zero and so is much smaller than ##|V''(0)|##.

Similarly, ##V^{(4)}(x)=\frac{24E_0}{a^4}## and ##|xV^{(4)}(0)|=\left | \frac{24E_0x}{a^4}\right | << |24a|=|V'''(0)|## for small ##x##.

All subsequent terms in the Taylor approximation are zero.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
zenterix said:
By equating this to zero we find points of stable equilibrium.
The equilibrium is not necessarily stable when the first derivative of the potential function is zero. Setting the derivative eequal to zero finds the extrema, local maxima or minima. You can (a) evaluate the second derivative at the points where the first vanishes or (b) plot the function and see for yourself.
 
$$V''(0)=-16a^2$$

Thus, ##0## is a local max of the potential and a local min of the force on the particle.

If we move away from ##0## into a positive ##x## then the force tends to take the particle farther away from ##0##. If we move into a negative ##x## then it seems the force restores the particle to ##0##. Thus, ##0## is a semi-stable equilibrium?

For the other two points with zero derivative, the second derivative at those points are parameterized expressions as can be seen below

1720283056019.png
 
Thread 'Minimum mass of a block'
Here we know that if block B is going to move up or just be at the verge of moving up ##Mg \sin \theta ## will act downwards and maximum static friction will act downwards ## \mu Mg \cos \theta ## Now what im confused by is how will we know " how quickly" block B reaches its maximum static friction value without any numbers, the suggested solution says that when block A is at its maximum extension, then block B will start to move up but with a certain set of values couldn't block A reach...
TL;DR Summary: Find Electric field due to charges between 2 parallel infinite planes using Gauss law at any point Here's the diagram. We have a uniform p (rho) density of charges between 2 infinite planes in the cartesian coordinates system. I used a cube of thickness a that spans from z=-a/2 to z=a/2 as a Gaussian surface, each side of the cube has area A. I know that the field depends only on z since there is translational invariance in x and y directions because the planes are...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Back
Top