What is sin x when x tends to infinity?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter misogynisticfeminist
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Infinity Sin
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The limit of sin x as x approaches infinity is undefined due to the periodic nature of the sine function. As x increases, sin x does not converge to any specific value, maintaining its oscillation between -1 and 1. A proof utilizing the definition of limits demonstrates that for any chosen x0, there exists an x greater than x0 such that the difference |f(x) - f(x0)| is greater than any small ε, confirming the non-convergence of sin x. Thus, limits do not apply in this context.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of periodic functions
  • Familiarity with limits in calculus
  • Basic knowledge of the sine function
  • Ability to interpret mathematical notation and proofs
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of periodic functions in depth
  • Learn about the formal definition of limits in calculus
  • Explore advanced topics in trigonometric functions
  • Investigate the implications of non-convergent sequences
USEFUL FOR

Students of mathematics, educators teaching calculus, and anyone interested in the behavior of trigonometric functions at infinity.

misogynisticfeminist
Messages
370
Reaction score
0
This question popped up in my head. What is sin x when x tends to infinity? Since sine is a preiodic functions which repeats itself, is the answer 1, -1 or 0 or something else altogether?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It is undefined; there is no limit! Sin[x] does not converge to any value as x increases - it maintains its periodic character. Limits only apply when something converges to something somewhere.

A proof is readily constructed from the def. of limits at \mbox{$\infty$}. Choose a small \mbox{$\epsilon$} ("1"is small enough) and show that for any x0, no matter how large, there exists an x>x0 such that

\|f(x)-f(x_0)\|\geq\epsilon.​

Plug in \mbox{$\epsilon=1$} and \mbox{$x=x_0+\frac{\pi}{2}$}.

What you show is that is not convergent, thus there is no limit.

Hey, does anyone know a better way to do inline LaTeX here?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
It looks good to me until \geq.

Daniel.
 
dextercioby said:
It looks good to me until \geq.

Daniel.

What's wrong with \geq? You want to show that \|f(x)-f(x_0)\|<\epsilon does not hold for all x>x_0, so you find an x where the relation is \geq instead of <.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K