The discussion centers on the defining characteristics of genius scientists such as Einstein and Newton, emphasizing that their genius stems from a combination of knowledge, curiosity, imagination, and persistence. Participants argue that these traits enable them to tackle complex problems that others may not approach. The conversation also touches on the notion that many could have achieved similar breakthroughs if given the same opportunities and time. Ultimately, the consensus is that genius is not solely about innate talent but also about the willingness to explore and solve problems.
PREREQUISITESThis discussion is beneficial for aspiring scientists, educators, and anyone interested in the psychology of innovation and the traits that contribute to groundbreaking scientific achievements.
That assumes that "few others could have done it". The "geniuses" just did it first, or were published first. Others could have done whatever, eventually, and if done later, their work just helped to add to the knowledge or helped to confirm the new knowledge.ChromeBit said:Many scientists are regarded as geniuses based on their work (Einstein, Newton, etc).
What is it about their work that is so clever that few others could have done it?