What is the acceleration of masses in an Atwood machine with a rotating pulley?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The acceleration of masses in an Atwood machine with a rotating pulley can be derived using Newton's second law and angular momentum principles. The correct formula for acceleration is given by a = \frac{g \cdot (m_2 - m_1)}{\frac{I}{R^2} + m_1 + m_2}. The discussion highlights the importance of considering external forces rather than internal forces to avoid double counting. The correct approach involves analyzing the torque produced by the weights of the masses acting on the pulley.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's second law of motion
  • Familiarity with angular momentum concepts
  • Knowledge of torque and rotational inertia
  • Basic grasp of Atwood machine mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of torque in rotational dynamics
  • Learn about the principles of angular momentum conservation
  • Explore variations of the Atwood machine with different pulley configurations
  • Investigate the effects of friction in pulley systems
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and anyone interested in mechanics, particularly those studying dynamics and rotational motion in systems like the Atwood machine.

dumbperson
Messages
77
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I'm trying to find the acceleration of the masses in an atwood machine, the pulley has a rotational inertia I. The pulley has a radius R

Picture : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Atwood.svg
But I made it accelerate the other way, so the equations from Newtons 2nd law are (a bit) different for this picture.

Homework Equations


m_1 \cdot a = T_1 - m_1 \cdot g
m_2 \cdot a = m_2 \cdot g - T_2
Ʃ \tau = \frac{dL}{dt}

The Attempt at a Solution


I know you can do it another way, but I wan't to do this with angular momentum L(with respect to midpoint of the pulley). The pulley has a radius R.

L= I_{pulley} \cdot \omega + (m_1 + m_2) \cdot R^2 \cdot \omega = I_{pulley} \cdot \frac{v}{R} + (m_1 +m_2)vR

So:
\frac{dL}{dt} = I_{pulley} \cdot \frac{a}{R} + (m_1 +m_2)a \cdot R
Ʃ \tau = T_2 \cdot R - T_1 \cdot R
T_2 = m_2 \cdot g -m_2 \cdot a
T_1 = m_1 \cdot a + m_2 \cdot g
So
Ʃ \tau = g \cdot R (m_2 - m_1) - a(m_2 +m_1)
Ʃ \tau = \frac{dL}{dt}
So
g \cdot R (m_2 - m_1) - a(m_2 +m_1)R = I_{pulley} \cdot \frac{a}{R} + (m_1 +m_2)a \cdot R

Solve for a and i'll get:
a=\frac{g \cdot (m_2 - m_1)}{\frac{I}{R^2}+2(m_1+m_2)}

The right answer should be:
a=\frac{g \cdot (m_2 - m_1)}{\frac{I}{R^2}+m_1+m_2}

I notice that if i say:
Ʃ \tau = gR(m_2-m_1) , I do get the right answer. But this is not true is it? this would only be true if the masses are not accelerating? is the angular momentum wrong ?

Where do I go wrong? thank you!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF! :smile:

I've included your picture for reference.

200px-Atwood.svg.png



You've treated the system as a whole.
This means you should only look at the external forces.

The external force applied on the left side is the weight of m1, which is m1g.
And on the right side you have m2g.
So the sum of all moments is:
$$\Sigma \tau = m_1g R - m_2g R$$
You have looked at the internal forces, but doing so, you are effectively counting things double.
 
I like Serena said:
Welcome to PF! :smile:

I've included your picture for reference.

200px-Atwood.svg.png
You've treated the system as a whole.
This means you should only look at the external forces.

The external force applied on the left side is the weight of m1, which is m1g.
And on the right side you have m2g.
So the sum of all moments is:
$$\Sigma \tau = m_1g R - m_2g R$$
You have looked at the internal forces, but doing so, you are effectively counting things double.

Oh that makes sense! So if I would not look at the whole system but just the pulley, I would get the right answer too if I say:
Ʃ \tau = T_2R-T_1R
But then L would be different
$$L= I \cdot \frac{v}{R} $$

That would be right too?
Thanks!
 
Yep.
 
thanks a lot
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K