What is the acceleration of masses in an Atwood machine with a rotating pulley?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the acceleration of masses in an Atwood machine with a rotating pulley, which has a specified rotational inertia and radius. The original poster presents equations derived from Newton's second law and angular momentum, noting a discrepancy between their derived expression for acceleration and the expected result.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to apply angular momentum concepts to derive the acceleration, questioning the validity of their approach when comparing results. They express uncertainty about the treatment of forces and moments in the system.

Discussion Status

Some participants provide guidance by suggesting a focus on external forces rather than internal ones, indicating that this perspective may clarify the original poster's confusion. There is an acknowledgment of the need to reassess the approach to the problem, particularly regarding the treatment of the system as a whole versus focusing on the pulley.

Contextual Notes

The original poster's calculations involve specific assumptions about the system's dynamics, and there is a discussion about the implications of these assumptions on the derived equations. The conversation reflects an exploration of the relationships between forces, torques, and angular momentum in the context of the Atwood machine.

dumbperson
Messages
77
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I'm trying to find the acceleration of the masses in an atwood machine, the pulley has a rotational inertia I. The pulley has a radius R

Picture : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Atwood.svg
But I made it accelerate the other way, so the equations from Newtons 2nd law are (a bit) different for this picture.

Homework Equations


m_1 \cdot a = T_1 - m_1 \cdot g
m_2 \cdot a = m_2 \cdot g - T_2
Ʃ \tau = \frac{dL}{dt}

The Attempt at a Solution


I know you can do it another way, but I wan't to do this with angular momentum L(with respect to midpoint of the pulley). The pulley has a radius R.

L= I_{pulley} \cdot \omega + (m_1 + m_2) \cdot R^2 \cdot \omega = I_{pulley} \cdot \frac{v}{R} + (m_1 +m_2)vR

So:
\frac{dL}{dt} = I_{pulley} \cdot \frac{a}{R} + (m_1 +m_2)a \cdot R
Ʃ \tau = T_2 \cdot R - T_1 \cdot R
T_2 = m_2 \cdot g -m_2 \cdot a
T_1 = m_1 \cdot a + m_2 \cdot g
So
Ʃ \tau = g \cdot R (m_2 - m_1) - a(m_2 +m_1)
Ʃ \tau = \frac{dL}{dt}
So
g \cdot R (m_2 - m_1) - a(m_2 +m_1)R = I_{pulley} \cdot \frac{a}{R} + (m_1 +m_2)a \cdot R

Solve for a and i'll get:
a=\frac{g \cdot (m_2 - m_1)}{\frac{I}{R^2}+2(m_1+m_2)}

The right answer should be:
a=\frac{g \cdot (m_2 - m_1)}{\frac{I}{R^2}+m_1+m_2}

I notice that if i say:
Ʃ \tau = gR(m_2-m_1) , I do get the right answer. But this is not true is it? this would only be true if the masses are not accelerating? is the angular momentum wrong ?

Where do I go wrong? thank you!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF! :smile:

I've included your picture for reference.

200px-Atwood.svg.png



You've treated the system as a whole.
This means you should only look at the external forces.

The external force applied on the left side is the weight of m1, which is m1g.
And on the right side you have m2g.
So the sum of all moments is:
$$\Sigma \tau = m_1g R - m_2g R$$
You have looked at the internal forces, but doing so, you are effectively counting things double.
 
I like Serena said:
Welcome to PF! :smile:

I've included your picture for reference.

200px-Atwood.svg.png
You've treated the system as a whole.
This means you should only look at the external forces.

The external force applied on the left side is the weight of m1, which is m1g.
And on the right side you have m2g.
So the sum of all moments is:
$$\Sigma \tau = m_1g R - m_2g R$$
You have looked at the internal forces, but doing so, you are effectively counting things double.

Oh that makes sense! So if I would not look at the whole system but just the pulley, I would get the right answer too if I say:
Ʃ \tau = T_2R-T_1R
But then L would be different
$$L= I \cdot \frac{v}{R} $$

That would be right too?
Thanks!
 
Yep.
 
thanks a lot
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K